Democrats Vote Down DHS Funding as Terror Attacks Strike
Republicans got the majority vote of 51 but 60 was needed to pass
On Thursday the Senate failed to advance a House-passed bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security.The motion to proceed lost 51 to 46. It needed 60 votes to move forward. Centrist Senator John Fetterman joined Republicans in support, but he was the only Democrat to do so. This marks the fourth time Democrats have blocked Homeland Security funding since February 12. Meanwhile key agencies like the TSA and others remain hampered by the funding gap.
Why Democrats Said No:
Senate Democrats explained their no votes by pointing to provisions that fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. They demanded reforms after a recent incident in Minneapolis where agents shot and killed two U.S. citizens. Democrats argue these agencies need accountability and changes before getting more money.Why Republicans Said Yes:
Republicans say funding must continue now to protect the homeland. That disagreement is the crux of the impasse.When lawmakers play politics while threats are real, Americans pay the price. Senators can push for reforms and still keep core security functions running.
Read more...
1 comment:
LOL
For years, the agricultural sector has faced a tight labor market as farmworkers age and fewer new immigrants and younger Americans are willing to toil in the fields. Top Trump administration officials vowed that mass deportations would help, leading to “higher wages with better benefits” and a “100 percent American work force.”
But the administration has quietly acknowledged in recent months that its immigration raids and crackdown on the border have aggravated the issue. So it has instead turned to an alternative source, making it cheaper for farmers to hire immigrant farmworkers on temporary visas.
Many farmers have celebrated those changes, made to an increasingly popular visa program known as H-2A, noting the difficulty in hiring American workers and tough economic conditions for the industry. But immigration hawks and labor unions alike are opposed, arguing the move will only increase the share of foreign workers and hurt native workers and suppress their wages.
Post a Comment