Muslim city of Dearborn is lost

'America, we have lost this city': Christian pastor erupts on Muslim town council over pro-Islam bias Sharia

Minister states, 'We will not have it anymore. Enough is enough'

Dearborn, Michigan, has a massive Muslim population. Members of that community, like other groups that have come to America, brought their own agenda, ideologies, beliefs, politics, economy and religion.

But there are concerns that Islam's Sharia law, which governs not just religion for Muslims but everything in their lives, and Sharia's demand that Islam ultimately dominate everyone, including non-Muslims, has caused alarm.

In that city, a Muslim mayor, Abdullah Hammoud, recently told a Christian minister that he was "not welcome here," and then refused to apologize for attacking the resident.

Hammoud's rage was unleashed when a resident objected to officials' decision to rename Warren Avenue in honor of Osama Silbani, who had delivered controversial opinions praising the Muslim terrorists in Hezbollah and Hamas as freedom fighters.

That clash, just a few months ago, had Hammoud blasting the Christian minister as a racist.

Katanji Brown Jackson

Justice Kagan rebukes fellow liberal Jackson in footnote over free speech ruling on Colorado conversion therapy ban

Justice Elena Kagan sided with seven colleagues to strike down Colorado's ban on so-called conversion therapy for minors, then used a footnote in her concurrence to take apart the reasoning of the lone holdout, fellow liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The 8-1 decision, handed down Tuesday, found that Colorado's 2019 law restricting what licensed therapists could say to minor clients amounted to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.

The ruling is a landmark win for religious liberty and free speech. But the sharper story may be what happened inside the Court's liberal wing, where Kagan and Justice Sonia Sotomayor broke from Jackson and joined the conservative majority, then went out of their way to explain why Jackson's dissent didn't hold together.

That kind of public correction between ideological allies is rare. It signals that Jackson's position, that states can regulate therapists' speech as mere "professional conduct", failed to persuade even the justices most sympathetic to her worldview.

Read more...

Bill Gates and curbing Freedom of Speech

Bill Gates Vows To Police Online Speech, Use Emerging Tech to Destroy First Amendment

The fight for America’s soul has always been about who gets to speak and who’s forced to shut up

From the town square to the printing press, our nation’s strength was forged in the fire of open debate. But the rules of the game have changed. A new front has opened in this timeless war—a silent, digital battlefield where powerful people are working overtime to seize control.

These unelected forces are done trying to persuade you; they are now building the tools to enforce their version of reality. In their hands, new technology like artificial intelligence is not a tool for progress, but a weapon for domination.

They are quietly constructing a digital prison for thought, an automated system to ensure that only one narrative—their narrative—is allowed to survive. It was never a matter of if, but who would be brazen enough to demand the keys.

We now have our answer. In a recent interview, billionaire tech tycoon Bill Gates used a personal family matter as the perfect excuse for a truly radical proposal.

Seeing my daughter targeted by false claims and harassment online was a wake-up call,” Gates said. “It made me realize that the problem of misinformation is not just about the present, but it’s also about the future we’re leaving for our children.”

Sure, every parent wants to protect their kids. That’s a given. But don’t let a billionaire’s family drama become the excuse to shred the Constitution. This is a classic Trojan horse.

Behind a father’s seemingly noble sentiment lies a chilling agenda to use the awesome power of AI to police what you are allowed to say, read, and believe. He wants to be the arbiter of truth, and he’s ready to build the machine that will enforce his judgment on everyone else.

Read more about it...

Fired for bad remarks about Kirk

Sociopathic Democrats gloat over murder of Charlie Kirk

The First Amendment does not guarantee you a job

Bob Frantz of Strictly Speaking: "The mass firings of thousands of barbaric sociopaths for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s brutal assassination on social media are not violations of the First Amendment, plain and simple.

For those who don't understand, please know that the First Amendment stops the government from locking you up for speech they don't like, but it sure as hell doesn't guarantee you a job. Employers have every right to sever all ties with antisocial people who glorify murder as long as the victims are people with whom they disagree.

If you ever find yourself publicly gloating over the killing of someone with different political views than you have, you’re essentially saying, “I’m cool with people being murdered as long as the circumstances are to my liking." And anyone who publicly announces that they are cool with murder when it happens is just one small step away from calling for the murder of the next person who fits their "right circumstances.”

So why on earth would an employer feel obligated to keep paying someone who creates a hostile environment by openly expressing their enthusiastic support for murdering other people under any circumstances? To put it another way, when employers are in the process of hiring people, they tend to prefer people they actually like, in addition to their qualifications.

So if a person indicates on a job application that they are "pro-homicide" when the time is right, the chances are good that they're not going to be hired. And if an employer wouldn't hire a candidate who supporters murder, why should they be expected to keep them employed once they find out?

So if you've been cheering since Charlie Kirk was killed in cold blood, the First Amendment will certainly keep you out of jail, but the Founding Fathers didn't say a damn thing about keeping you out of the unemployment line."

The real Extremist was a product of Leftist Ideology

Chris Coons used Charlie Kirk’s assassination to attack the internet in one move that exposed the Left’s real agenda

Democrat Senator blames the internet for Charlie Kirk’s murder

The conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder had dedicated his life to engaging with political opponents in the arena of ideas – exactly the kind of free speech discourse that makes America great.

But instead of focusing on the deranged individual who pulled the trigger, Democrat Senator Chris Coons of Delaware immediately pivoted to attacking the internet itself.

Within days of Charlie Kirk’s murder, Democrats like Coons were already crafting their narrative to use this tragedy as justification for more internet censorship and speech restrictions.

It’s the same playbook they’ve used for years – when political violence occurs, immediately blame conservative platforms and free speech rather than address the actual perpetrator.

So here we have a young man from a conservative household who was radicalized by leftist ideology to the point where he felt justified in assassinating someone simply for holding different political views.

The irony is staggering – a conservative family produces the hero (the father who turned in the killer) while the Left produces both the ideology that motivated the assassination and the politicians now exploiting it for censorship.

Read more...

Free Speech not prevalent in Colleges and Universities

Report: Florida State, South Florida lead six in top 100

Florida State and the South Florida led six institutions in the top 100 of the 257 schools analyzed in the largest annual review of free speech for colleges and universities.

Both schools earned a C-minus letter grade, with Florida State scoring a 71 and the University of South Florida a 70. Also scoring in the top third of the nationwide rankings were Florida (45th, 64, D), Florida International (53rd, 63, D), Florida Atlantic (68th, 61, D-minus), and Central Florida (80th, 60, D-minus).

FIRE, the acronym for Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, based the rankings on 68,000 students at 253 colleges and universities.

Claremont McKenna College, in Claremont, Calif., scored an 80 for a B-minus to lead the rankings. Purdue (76, C) and the University of Chicago (76, C) were next. On the other end, Northeastern (47, F), the University of Washington (44, F) and Indiana (44, F) were the bottom three.

Florida State fell 17 spots from the previous year. The report says students attempted to disinvite Charlie Kirk, a national leader in debate killed on Wednesday in Utah. Kirk was in Tallahassee on Feb. 28.

The report says Florida State is bottom 25 for openness, and it “could strengthen its speech culture by adopting an official commitment to institutional neutrality.”

Read this shocking Report

The Lies the Left told

On the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and what it means for us all

PART 1: When the left said it was tired of free speech, we should have believed it

Alex Berenson Sep 11, 2025

Want to find a society’s power center?

Follow an assassin’s bullet.

For decades, the left used its control of the legacy media, Hollywood, and academia to decide not just what issues but even what facts could be discussed. It deemed those it finds ideologically uncomfortable to be outside the pale.

The original sin came with the frank denial that differing rates of criminality — rather than police or criminal justice disparities — are the reason so many black people are in prison.

Once the media agreed to that lie, the rest followed: That drug use was harmless and should be medicalized and decriminalized; that open immigration always benefitted society and was opposed only by bigots; that men and women had no innate differences and gender was a social construct.

Read more...

Foreign Judge Accused Of Targeting MAGA Faces Huge Consequences

Alexandre de Moraes, Corruption personified

There is an old maxim that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

In the case of Alexandre de Moraes, Justice of Brazil‘s Supreme Federal Tribunal (STF), the phrase feels less like a cautionary adage and more like a clinical diagnosis. What began as a seemingly standard judicial appointment has curdled into something far more corrosive: an extraterritorial assault on civil liberties, waged by a man who now finds himself compelled to explain his actions before a US court.

The lawsuit filed by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) and Rumble against Moraes has not only survived initial scrutiny, it has drawn the Brazilian justice into an unprecedented legal confrontation with American constitutional protections. The man who silenced critics in Brazil is now being forced to speak.

Moraes’s rise to power began with a suspicious appointment. In 2017, Brazil was in the midst of the explosive Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato) corruption investigation, which implicated some of the nation’s most powerful political and business figures.

Justice Teori Zavascki, who had been overseeing the case, died suddenly in a plane crash, a death that many found too convenient given the political stakes.

With Zavascki gone, then-President Michel Temer, himself a subject of corruption investigations, quickly appointed Moraes, his former justice minister, to the STF, ensuring that someone loyal to the political establishment, rather than an impartial jurist, would have a decisive role in shaping the Court’s direction.

Moraes is accused of attempting to enforce Brazilian speech laws in the United States, using the threat of criminal and financial penalties to compel compliance.

His orders, often sealed and undisclosed to the public, demanded the removal of accounts belonging to political dissidents, many of whom had fled to the US seeking the protection of its more liberal speech regime. One such dissident, described in the lawsuit as “Political Dissident A,” remains in the US after a rejected extradition request. Moraes’s response? Pressure American companies to silence him anyway

Read about it...

X sues Letitia James

Elon Musk Reportedly Targets Letitia James In Free Speech Showdown

Elon Musk’s social media company X Corp reportedly sued New York Attorney General Letitia James in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday, saying the state’s “Stop Hiding Hate” law tramples the First Amendment by forcing platforms to reveal how they police user speech.

The law, modeled after a now-revised California measure, requires large social networks to publish their content moderation rules and file twice-yearly reports to the attorney general detailing “hate speech” removals, “disinformation” takedowns and other enforcement actions.

X argues the disclosures mandate mirrors the California law a federal appeals court partially blocked last year, according to Reuters.

Read more...

Rick Sanchez story

Rick Sanchez spent a lifetime in television before becoming one of the highest rated anchors at RT (Russia Today)

Last summer, the Biden administration forced him out of his job and threatened him with jail for refusing to repeat Zelensky’s talking points.

A case study on the death of free speech:

(0:00) Advice From Larry King
(4:27) The Neocon Chokehold on Corporate Media
(8:48) What Was It Like Working for a Russian-Owned Network During the War?
(13:51) Are We Seeing the Death of Free Speech in America?
(19:00) How Biden’s State Department Made Sanchez’s Show Illegal
(32:06) The Russian’s Perspective on the War
(39:33) The Things You Can’t Say Working for Corporate Media
(45:42) So-Called Journalists Defending the Establishment
(55:57) The Deep State’s Worship of War, Death, and Destruction

Video on X

Ricardo León Sánchez de Reinaldo is a Cuban-American journalist, radio host, and author. After working as the lead local anchor on Miami's WSVN, Sánchez moved to cable news, first as a daytime anchor at MSNBC, later at CNN, where he began as a correspondent and ultimately rose to become an anchor.

Free Speech

 

Fake News getting more ridiculous

CBS News host claims free speech is how the Germans started the Holocaust

gets remedial history lesson from Marco Rubio

CBS News Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan didn't embarrass herself enough when JD Vance was on. She felt it necessary to double down talking about Vance to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

At issue is JD Vance defending free speech in Europe. Brennan claims free speech is what led Germany to the Holocaust. No, really. This is a thing that was said on the television. On a "news" program meant to inform. In 2025.

Rubio clapped back as the kids say, and was all like, "Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide. The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime. There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. There was also no opposition in Nazi Germany. That’s not an accurate reflection of history."

What's with these "news" organizations? Scary stuff.

Read about the leftist twats who work at and run CBS News

Zuckerberg getting rid of Fact-Checkers

Mark Zuckerberg Claims Facebook Is Ditching “Fact-Checkers” and Going to Community Notes Similar to 𝕏

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is a scoundrel, a billionaire snake who has backstabbed pretty much everyone he’s personally dealt with ever since rising to prominence. He spent over $400 million of his own money to prevent President Donald Trump from winning in 2020. His “platform” has been amongst the most egregious suppressors of speech for nearly a decade.

It’s important to understand the context surrounding Zuckerberg following a string of seemingly positive moves. First, he met with President Trump’s team to try to get involved with the administration. Then, he donated $1,000,000 to President Trump’s inauguration fund. Yesterday, he added Trump ally Dana White to the board at Meta. Now this…

“We're gonna get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms. More specifically, we're gonna get rid of fact checkers."

Getting rid of the left-wing crazy fact-checkers is a great thing...get rid of the biased programmed algorithims too. I was in Facebook jail so many times that it was ridiculous. My longest stint was 3 months. Just recently I was banned for 24 hours for using the word "throttle."

Read more about Zuck

Colorado loses Free Speech Rights Case

Colorado agrees to pay $1.5 million in legal fees to Christian web designer Lorie Smith

after losing a Supreme Court case over free speech rights

• The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of Lorie Smith, allowing businesses to refuse services for same-sex weddings based on free speech rights

• Colorado will pay over $1.5 million in legal fees to Smith after losing the case

• The ruling is seen as a landmark victory for religious freedom and free speech

• Smith challenged Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act, arguing it would force her to violate her beliefs

• The case highlights ongoing legal battles faced by business owners with religious convictions

A Pathetic and Anti-American Attempt to Silence Elon

Shocking! Bill Clinton’s Former Labor Secretary Want’s Elon Musk Jailed!

Using power to silence opponents

It’s absolutely laughable how the left operates these days.

Take Robert Reich, for example, former Labor Secretary under Bill Clinton. Reich, in his infinite wisdom, recently penned a column attacking Elon Musk, calling him “out of control” and claiming he needs to be reined in.

This, coming from a man who served in one of the most corrupt administrations in recent history, is nothing short of hypocritical. But it gets worse.

Reich’s entire argument against Musk reeks of the left’s typical double standards. If Elon Musk were a mouthpiece for the left, there would be no such backlash—no calls for regulation, no threats of arrest, nothing. It’s the ultimate hypocrisy, and frankly, it’s disgusting.

Democrats really want America to be a Banana Republic, not a democracy.

“This guy @Alexandre is an outright criminal of the worst kind, masquerading as a judge,” said Elon

Elon's X banned in Brazil

A Brazilian Supreme Court justice on Friday ordered the suspension of Elon Musk’s social media giant X in Brazil after the tech billionaire refused to name a legal representative in the country, according to a copy of the decision seen by The Associated Press.

Justice Alexandre de Moraes had warned Musk on Wednesday night that X could be blocked in Brazil if he failed to comply with his order to name a representative, and established a 24-hour deadline. The company hasn’t had a representative in the country since earlier this month.

In his decision, de Moraes gave internet service providers and app stores five days to block access to X, and said the platform will remain blocked until it complies with his orders. He also said people or companies who use virtual private networks, or VPNs, to access X will be subject to daily fines of 50,000 reais ($8,900).

Musk, a self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist,” has repeatedly claimed the justice’s actions amount to censorship, and his argument has been echoed by Brazil’s political right. He has often insulted de Moraes on his platform, characterizing him as a dictator and tyrant.

Read more about it...

The Left turning MAGA into a hate symbol

The Left want to turn MAGA into a literal hate symbol

The Democrat Media Complex has spewed anti-Donald Trump propaganda for nine years.

The propaganda has been so thick that Democrats want people to associate a MAGA hat with a swastika.

That’s why there have been so many instances of unhinged leftists attacking people with MAGA hats, snatching them off people’s heads, and other outrageous behavior.

And a black Trump supporter named Aura Moody was denied entry to a New York Mets game at Citi Field for donning a MAGA cap. She and friend were told to take them off and they couldn't even put them in their purse.

Moody told The Post, “The United States of America is no longer the vehicle of freedom and tolerance. . .I am living under a communist regime where our freedoms are trampled upon. . .that was the first thought that came to my mind.”

Read about it...

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

"First Amendment is not absolute," says Tim Walz

YES IT IS, TIM!

Minnesota Gov. Walz Attacks Free Speech, Claims ‘No Guarantee’ Of First Amendment Rights

In a move that has left many conservatives and free speech advocates reeling, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) has openly challenged the fundamental principles of the First Amendment.

In a recent interview with MSNBC’s The ReidOut, Walz boldly stated that “there’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, especially around our democracy.”

Walz’s comments come as a direct affront to the Constitution. The governor, who has aligned himself with the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party, claimed that “misinformation” has been rampant in discussions surrounding elections, the January 6th events, and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read about it...

Joe Biden has said the same thing many times...it's no wonder why Democrats want to destroy the Supreme Court.

The First Amendment: The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws respecting an establishment of religion; prohibiting the free exercise of religion; or abridging the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.

FBI had authorization to use “deadly force” in the ridiculous raid at Mar-A-Lago

Jack Smith Seeks SECOND Gag Order Against Trump

Special Counsel Jack Smith is once again attempting to SILENCE President Trump.

This time, it has to do with Trump’s claims that the FBI was authorized to assassinate him during the ‘classified docs’ raid on Mar-a-Lago back in 2022.

Last week, it was revealed that the FBI has authorization to use “deadly force” in the ridiculous raid on President Trump’s private property. Once news of this broke, Trump was FURIOUS and declared that agents were “locked and loaded ready to take me out and put my family in danger.”

Now, in a recent court filing, Jack Smith is denying those claims and asking a federal judge to issue a gag order against Trump preventing him from “falsely” suggesting that FBI agents “were complicit in a plot to assassinate” him.

Read more...

Under Democrats' rule, free speech is pretty much dead in America.