Sociopathic Democrats gloat over murder of Charlie Kirk

The First Amendment does not guarantee you a job

Bob Frantz of Strictly Speaking: "The mass firings of thousands of barbaric sociopaths for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s brutal assassination on social media are not violations of the First Amendment, plain and simple.

For those who don't understand, please know that the First Amendment stops the government from locking you up for speech they don't like, but it sure as hell doesn't guarantee you a job. Employers have every right to sever all ties with antisocial people who glorify murder as long as the victims are people with whom they disagree.

If you ever find yourself publicly gloating over the killing of someone with different political views than you have, you’re essentially saying, “I’m cool with people being murdered as long as the circumstances are to my liking." And anyone who publicly announces that they are cool with murder when it happens is just one small step away from calling for the murder of the next person who fits their "right circumstances.”

So why on earth would an employer feel obligated to keep paying someone who creates a hostile environment by openly expressing their enthusiastic support for murdering other people under any circumstances? To put it another way, when employers are in the process of hiring people, they tend to prefer people they actually like, in addition to their qualifications.

So if a person indicates on a job application that they are "pro-homicide" when the time is right, the chances are good that they're not going to be hired. And if an employer wouldn't hire a candidate who supporters murder, why should they be expected to keep them employed once they find out?

So if you've been cheering since Charlie Kirk was killed in cold blood, the First Amendment will certainly keep you out of jail, but the Founding Fathers didn't say a damn thing about keeping you out of the unemployment line."