Showing posts with label NGO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NGO. Show all posts

Friday, June 5, 2026

Anatomy of an Operation

Delaney Hall Protest

On the night of June 1, 2026, journalist @NickSortor drove to Delaney Hall expecting what he’d seen for ten straight days: hundreds of protesters surrounding Newark’s 1,000-bed ICE detention facility, human chains blocking federal vehicles, pepper balls and tear gas, helmets and gas masks distributed from organized supply stations, catered meals arriving on schedule.

He found silence. The crowd — 200-plus the night before — was gone, with tens of thousands of dollars in pre-staged gear abandoned in place.

What happened between Sunday morning and Sunday night was a single message in an encrypted Signal group, as discovered by @bitchuneedsoap. A Cosecha NJ communicator posted a six-line announcement: “Cosecha is NOT mobilizing to Delaney Hall tonight. We are talking to strikers and their families to regroup.” No negotiation, no vote, no gradual loss of enthusiasm. Some switch had been flipped off.

The natural question is how a protest of that size can be turned off with one message. The answer is that it was never a protest in the way most people understand the word.

It was an operation — assembled, maintained, and disbanded through an organizational structure that looks, once you map it, like a military deployment with a nonprofit org chart.

Read more about it...

Friday, May 1, 2026

Beijing’s Trojan Horse

The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation

The NGO Network Quietly Strangling American Data Centers & AI

"The most effective influence operation in 2026 is the one that does not look like an influence operation.

Most Americans, when they think about Chinese influence at all, picture something cinematic. They picture a senator on a stage in the Capitol, flanked by two advisors to the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, nodding along to a discussion of how the United States should slow down its own AI industry.

That happened on April 29, 2026, when (communist) Bernie Sanders convened Xue Lan and Zeng Yi for an event titled “The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation.” It was a useful spectacle. It was also a distraction.

The real damage to American AI competitiveness in 2026 is not being done in the Capitol on a Wednesday evening. It is being done quietly, week after week, in 38 state legislatures, by a coalition of NGOs whose funding and intellectual lineage trace back to the same upstream ecosystem that platformed Xue and Zeng, and that has been operating in plain sight for over a decade.

The point of this essay is to lay out, carefully and without exaggeration, why federal preemption of state AI law is no longer a deregulatory preference.

It is a national security necessity. And then to pose what I will call the Manhattan Project test: a single yes-or-no question that, in my view, separates honest AI safety advocacy from de facto strategic alignment with Beijing.

The question Congress should be asking is not whether federal preemption violates conservative principles. The question is whether the United States can afford to let 38 statehouses, lobbied by NGOs whose intellectual lineage runs through Beijing-aligned framings, set the operating constraints for the technology on which the next century of American power depends. The answer is no."

Read the article by Alexander Muse

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Interior Secretary exposes corruption

Democrat melts down after Secretary Doug Burgum drops bombshell about NGOs during committee hearing

Democrats had a meltdown during a committee hearing while grilling Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum on all of the programs he is attempting to shut down.

And no one was ready for his answer.

HOLY CRAP! Trump Interior Sec. Doug Burgum just revealed he found NGOs where up to 100% PERCENT of their revenue was the federal government...

...and their CEO would make $650K a YEAR, and pay lobbyists $400K.

He exposes it: "We found organizations that were receiving grants from Interior, where 80 to 100 percent of the revenue of that NGO was a grant from the federal government."

See video on X

Monday, April 7, 2025

Democrats' Fake NGO Money Laundering Scheme

Democrats are laundering money

Elon Musk CONFIRMS with Jesse Watters Democrats are laundering money through a network of NGO’s, the money is coming back to them, and that’s how they’ve gotten so rich.

Elon Musk also confirms Democrats need to start being arrested for the fake NGO money laundering scam. “With respect to the non-governmental organizations, these sort of fake NGOs, I think there needs to be a number of arrests in that regard as well.

Because these are fake charities where mostly Democrats and what's it called, and I want to be clear, there's sometimes a little bit of Republican in there — So that's where you start getting the uniparty thing going on. But it is overwhelmingly to Democrats and they give these billions of dollars to NGOs run by Democrats that then go through a whole network of additional NGOs. It's a giant money laundering scheme.

"Really at this point, I think the word NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous,” said Musk.

Watch on X

Saturday, March 1, 2025

$5 billion grant from Biden to Green Organization Anti-Trumpers

Biden granted billions to 'green' org whose top execs gave generously to Dems

In 2024 the EPA awarded the Coalition for Green Capital a $5 BILLION grant to create an NGO "Green Bank" outside congressional control.

Top executives of a green organization that the Biden Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) selected to receive billions in public funds have collectively made hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal political donations to Democratic candidates and organizations in recent years, a Daily Caller News Foundation review of Federal Election Commission (FEC) data found.

The Biden EPA chose the Coalition for Green Capital (CGC) as an awardee of $5 billion in taxpayer funds through the administration's massive Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) program in April 2024.

Reed Hundt, the CGC's former CEO and chairman and Richard Kauffman — the group's CEO who replaced Hundt in January — hav personally donated thousands of dollars to Democrats.

Notably, Hundt's personal account on X featured numerous anti-Trump posts — including ones endorsing efforts to remove Trump from the ballot — before it was deleted. Hundt did not respond to a request for comment.

Read more at WND