Conservative Commentary/Opinion on Local, State & National issues. Hours 7am to 7pm to respond to comments. Globalists, Socialists, Communists and anti-Conservatives not welcomed.
Forget Fox, Shepard Smith to anchor evening news CNBC
This will be a much better fit for this Trump hater.
Starting in the Fall on CNBC, he will be up against The Story with Martha MacCallum on Fox, his former network. MacCallum happens to be a very good journalist, not an opinion reporter like Smith.
"Watching Fake News CNN is better than watching Shepard Smith," Trump once wrote.
Sleepy eyes Carl Cameron rushes to MSNBC to tell the world how wonderful Shepard Smith is and how horrible Fox News is. Fox is not amused!
by Thomas Madison October 15, 2019
"Cameron actually reported and apparently believes, 'It is a real sad day for people who watch Fox News and want accurate information because Shep was somebody who you could reliably count on.'
Shepard Smith is a disgrace as a journalist. His 'news' program was nothing more than a daily hour of shameless Trump hatred. There was nothing objective or nonpartisan about Smith’s show. It was a daily Trump-bashing editorial."
Even at our local elections, poll watching is now the norm. Why would candidates believe that it is necessary to have them? Everyone knows fraud happens. One fraudulent vote can change a result.
The Democrats and the Fake News Media love to hammer President Trump when he talks about voter fraud. Even yesterday on Fox News, Shepard Smith gave the same old line..."it can't be proven." They try to convince you that Donald Trump is a nut job or that he is obsessed with Hillary's popular vote and that the Democrats are all squeaky clean.
"But here's how it can be finally proven that countless votes being cast in U.S. elections are completely fraudulent..."
Here's how to prove it...and now with Donald Trump as president, we can get to the truth and expose the cover-up that has occurred over the past eight years.
Shepard Smith on Fox mentioned the U.S. Supreme Court’s 4-4 decision not to reinstate provisions of North Carolina’s voter ID law during his afternoon program saying that the laws were discriminatory against blacks and designed by Republican states. What a bunch of hogwash. Lately, I keep turning this guy off. He should move to MSNBC.
Why shouldn't voters have to prove their identity? How is it discriminatory? This country is polarized right down to whom should be allowed to vote--citizen and non-citizen, voter ID or not.
Then we have the flaming liberals who insist that non-citizens be allowed to vote in local elections like Mayor de Blasio in New York. "There are an estimated 1.3 million non-citizen residents in NYCity, about 500,000 of whom are undocumented. Right now, neither the documented green-card holders nor the illegal aliens are allowed to vote." Laws are being loosened by Democrats and it makes it far easier to cheat in elections if the laws are loose and not enforced. Hillary is counting on votes from dead people.
Flooding this country with illegal votes, particularly when they
come from one country and are here illegally due to one political party
refusing to enforce the laws congress (the only law making body IAW
construction) has passed into law, the same which benefits from illegal
voting is high treason and in effect accomplishes the same thing the
constitutional requirements to be President sought to preclude. It
amounts to one political party colluding with a foreign nation
(Mexico) to subvert our democracy. This is the highest form of treason
there is. This is why the Democratic party is fighting voter ID. Well
organizations are going to beef up voter poll watching. When illegals
are caught voting they are going to face deportation for voter fraud.
When they squeal on their American organizers, treason charges need to
be filled against them. Such Americans should be stripped of their
citizenship and either imprisoned or deported to Mexico. But, Americans
are not going to allow their democracy to be stolen by corrupt,
charlatan politicians. Stand by for 2016 saysCheryl Gumulauski
“Governor, you know that phrase you just used is one that is seen by
many as derogatory, right?” Smith asked Jindal. “I just wonder why it is
that you used that phrase when there’s a certain segment of the
population that believes it’s a real dig on them.”
The other night Shepard Smith on FOX News had a segment on unmanned aircraft called drones...little tiny aircraft used for recon and intelligence missions. Knowing nothing about this, I thought it very fascinating. Down the road, we will have the ability to spy on everything and everyone. Some day, the whole world will have the technology and perhaps then we won't need a Julian or the National Enquirer.
In October, NASA conducted the first test flights of its newly acquired Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk, a jet-powered drone that can fly at altitudes up to 65,000 feet (where it can avoid the rough weather of polar regions) for more than 31 hours at a time. It can literally fly to the other end of the earth on a single tank of fuel.
Many companies are developing drones: Boeing, Lockheed Martin, The Naval Research laboratory, Aurora Flight Sciences, to name a few. There is nothing greater than U.S. ingenuity.
