Showing posts with label Justice Alito. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice Alito. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Is Justice Sam Alito considering retirement?

Justice Alito's 20-year milestone and upcoming book fuel retirement speculation

Legal scholars are reading the tea leaves on Justice Samuel Alito, and they like what they see.

Two prominent law professors have pointed to a constellation of factors, including Alito's age, his recently passed 20-year tenure mark, favorable political conditions, and the curious timing of a forthcoming book, as signals that the 75-year-old justice may be preparing to step down from the Supreme Court.

To be clear: Alito has said nothing. His office has said nothing. The Supreme Court did not respond to requests for comment.

This is informed speculation, not a confirmed development. But the speculation itself is worth examining, because the logic behind it is sound, and the stakes are enormous.

The political math is simple. A retirement now, or within the next several months, gives President Trump a clean path to nominate a successor and gives the Republican Senate a clean path to confirm one. Wait too long, and that calculus could change dramatically.

Read more... about Alito retirement speculation.

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

Texas Map Sparks Heated Legal Battle--Justice Alito steps in

Justice Alito pauses ruling on Texas congressional boundaries

Hold onto your hats, folks—Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito just threw a lifeline to Texas Republicans with a last-minute block on a federal court’s decision to toss out the state’s new congressional map.

On November 21, 2025, Alito issued an administrative stay, ensuring the disputed boundaries remain in play while the Supreme Court mulls over the case, giving GOP candidates a fighting chance as challenges mount, The Daily Caller reported.

Earlier this year, Texas Republicans, nudged by former President Donald Trump, redrew the state’s congressional map.

This new layout, with potential for up to five GOP pickups, didn’t sit well with everyone, especially advocacy groups like the League of United Latin American Citizens.

Just days ago, on November 18, a federal panel in the Western District of Texas, by a tight 2-1 vote, declared the map likely a racial gerrymander, striking it down and igniting a firestorm.

Governor Greg Abbott wasn’t about to let that stand, filing an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday evening, pushing for clarity before the candidate filing deadline on December 8.

Read more...

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Justice Alito

Justice Alito issues reminder of what SCOTUS must do, even if unpopular

Americans might lose faith, but the faithful must not lose their rights under the Constitution, suggested Alito.

Unlike certain recent additions to the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Samuel Alito has consistently delivered for God-fearing conservatives and constitutionalists.

This consistency and Alito's resistance to the fads of the day have made him a popular target for Democratic lawmakers and other radical leftists, along with their fellow travelers in the liberal media.

Democrats including Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) have, for instance, pressured Alito to recuse himself from cases of consequence. Other Democrats, such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), have painted a target on his back, calling him a "threat to our democracy." Liberal publications such as the New York Times and ProPublica have pushed false narratives framing him as an extremist or at the very least as unethical. A false-flagger who helped the Lincoln Project stage a fake white supremacist rally in 2021 futilely tried to catch Alito saying something damning on tape. A radical even allegedly threatened to assassinate him last year.

Alito underscored in his recent interview with Peter Robinson, host of the Hoover Institution's "Uncommon Knowledge," that the judiciary has a responsibility to resist possession by the zeitgeist and to do what is right, even if unpopular.

Read more...

Monday, April 21, 2025

Justice Alito questions the Legality of SCOTUS opinion

Alito Calls Supreme Court Block of Venezuelan Gang Deportations ‘Legally Questionable’

The high court shunned normal procedure in blocking the removals, Justice Samuel Alito said in a dissent joined by Justice Clarence Thomas

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito filed a strongly worded dissent from the court’s order issued early April 19 that temporarily blocked the Trump administration from deporting alleged members of the Venezuelan criminal gang Tren de Aragua.

The dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, was posted on the court’s website early on April 20.

“In sum, literally in the middle of the night, the Court issued unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party, within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual support for its order, and without providing any explanation for its order,” Alito wrote.

“I refused to join the Court’s order because we had no good reason to think that, under the circumstances, issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate.”

Opinion

Friday, July 12, 2024

AOC going after SCOTUS' two Conservative Judges

AOC Files Articles of Impeachment Against Thomas and Alito

The articles are unlikely to pass the House, but signal Democrats' growing discontent with the Supreme Court's ethical impunity.

The first impeachment resolution includes the following impeachment articles against Justice Thomas:
  • Failure to disclose financial income, gifts and reimbursements, property interests, liabilities, and transactions, among other information.
  • Refusal to recuse from matters concerning his spouse’s legal interest in cases before the court.
  • Refusal to recuse from matters involving his spouse’s financial interest in cases before the court.

The second impeachment resolution includes the following impeachment articles against Justice Alito:
  • Refusal to recuse from cases in which he had a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party in cases before the court.
  • Failure to disclose financial income, gifts and reimbursements, property interests, liabilities, and transactions, among other information.
Democrats for years have criticized the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, over rulings that advanced causes popular on the right. These have included rolling back abortion rights, expanding gun rights, rejecting race-conscious collegiate admissions and ruling that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution for official acts in office in a decision favoring Donald Trump.

Ocasio-Cortez said in a statement that Thomas and Alito's "pattern of refusal to recuse from consequential matters before the court in which they hold widely documented financial and personal entanglements constitutes a grave threat to American rule of law."

Read about it...

Wednesday, June 5, 2024

Justice Alito says, "Buzz off!"

An emblem that dates back to the Revolutionary War to symbolize the fight against tyranny and "recognizing America's reliance on the protection and Providence of God

Democrats declared a scorched earth war on Samuel Alito that ended in this unthinkable outcome

New York Times risks inciting violence against Alito with dangerous misinformation campaign

The Left cranked the smear machine up to 11 in targeting Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

Liberals only goal was total destruction of Alito.

And Democrats declared a scorched earth war on Samuel Alito that ended in this unthinkable outcome.

The pro-Democrat Party activists at the New York Times invented a fake scandal about Samuel Alito based on two flags flying at this house.

Alito’s wife flew an American flag upside down at their home shortly before Joe Biden’s inauguration.

Mrs. Alito flew the flag – which is often flown that way as a protest and signal of distress – following a dispute with two unhinged liberal neighbors who displayed profane signs about Donald Trump and Justice Alito.

One of the neighbors also called Mrs. Alito the “c” word.

The other flag liberals objected to was The “Appeal to Heaven” flag commissioned by George Washington during the American Revolution. It has flown in front of the San Francisco City Hall for 60 years.

Read more about it...