A memory from when the city conspired against the residents
SHOCK III: Committee Conspired to Keep Beach Build Plans from Residents to Get Szerdi Re-elected
The Lake Worth Tribune By Margaret Menge"In an audio recording of its February 10, 2015 meeting, members of the ITN Committee are heard conspiring to keep plans to build at the beach from the public to make sure John Szerdi would win re-election to the City Commission.
“I would recommend we do not have any kind of public meeting until after the election,” said William Waters, a city employee who oversees the building and code compliance departments. “If we have a public meeting, and it gets out (unintelligible)….you can say goodbye to Szerdi,” he said.
Commissioner Andy Amoroso, the Commission’s liaison to the ITN Committee, quickly agreed, saying, “Absolutely, you cannot do this before…”
News of Hudson Holdings’ proposal to build a convention center and private beach club at the Lake Worth beach did get out before the election – after Steve Michael of Hudson Holdings met with owners of the Gulfstream Condominiums in late February and Commissioner Christopher McVoy happened to be in the room. McVoy took detailed notes of the meeting, and provided them to the Tribune, which published a story just two weeks before the election.
Read the article...
As it turned out, John Szerdi lost his re-election bid on March 10, 2015 to first-time candidate Ryan Maier by a 20-percent margin, winning just 37 percent of the vote to Maier’s 57 percent." And did they ever give Ryan Maier a hard time after that..drove him out of town eventually.
Now the city, with a memory like an elephant and still wanting to screw up our beach and city, is doing that same thing in a ballot initiative.
Vote NO on Amendments 2 & 3 on March 10, 2026. We want to keep our historic beach and small town.
8 comments:
Damn right, Lynn. thanks for this reminder. We defeated it then and there is every reason to do so once again.
I voted no, but there are signs all around me, with the words vote YES on 3. I'd like to see some people get paid to take the signs down, just like they are paying people to put the signs up. FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE!
@5:37...this was put out by a political action committee. They might have received some donations to print up their signs but they are not gettng paid to distribute them.
Well, there must be some remuneration. People don't just do anything for nothing.
The reward is winning against the ballot initiative. No remuneration--just the win!
Well, why doesn't the other side go around and take the signs down? Most of them are not on private property.
@2:34...Because they want to work within the law. Generally, no, you are not allowed to remove campaign signs from public property. While public property regulations vary by jurisdiction, tampering with, stealing, or destroying political signs is often considered a crime (petty theft or vandalism) and is illegal, even if the sign is in a public right-of-way, as they are protected as free speech.
Vote No on everything
Post a Comment