Sunday, September 8, 2013

Anthony Pugliese and powerful developer interests

Comment Up

On March 11, 2013, a Judge agreed to return the passports of Delray Beach developer Anthony Pugliese and his business manager Joseph Reamer as they await trial on charges they stole nearly $1.2 million from Subway franchise founder Fred DeLuca in a failed land development, Destiny, Florida. He's back in the news today. Even though he's facing grand theft and money laundering charges as well as stealing approximately $1.2  million...he now has asked the Judge to allow him to travel to Italy for 9 days.

The Destiny project had been highly controversial and contentious from inception. In 2009 Osceola County proposed an amendment in its comprehensive building plan for a "new city overlay on more than 500,000 acres in a rural area in the county," which would allow for the construction of the Destiny development as well as several other large-scale projects. The Florida Department of Community Affairs opposed the amendment, citing the Florida’s Growth Management Act and stating the amendment would contribute to urban sprawl. The PB Post back in 2009 said "it is an inappropriate exploitation of natural resources and will be a setback for Florida."

In 2011, Florida legislators wiped out 30 years of growth management law and passed measures to restrict the public from challenging controversial development projects in the name of economic development. We here in Lake Worth know what all these shenanigans are about and have been dealing with developer backed politicians for years. Recently the Lake Worth city commission denied the results of an election to change its Charter held this past March that would have limited heights in downtown Lake Worth to 4 stories because of some law that Rick Scott passed in June 2013, three months AFTER the election, that they say makes our vote moot. This is being challenged. The commission has now passed an overlay Hotel District allowing heights to go to 6 stories.

Throughout the years, Florida residents have had to challenge those with the power--developers and politicians, and those sitting on major boards who are forcing heights and/or sprawl even believing their own lies and twisting the truth to get their way. Lobbyists, politicians and those hell bent on ruining our State and local  municipalities, continue to effect laws under the guise of "we need growth" and the hell with what you want and your quality of life and the Florida environment.

And Anthony Pugliese gets to have a European vacation.

5 comments:

Weetha Peebull said...

Forget the Developers - they are small potatoes compared to HUD
and the UNLIMITED TAXPAYER WALLET!
(How's this compare to FEMA wanting Money Back - Hope the 23M NSP-2 was
spent right! Dern Strings Attached!)

The Developers will only have to line up in the Federal Government
Economic Development Feeding Trough!

"It demands that the county sue its localities over such common zoning regulations, which are not exclusionary by any stretch of the imagination. If HUD can define what constitutes exclusionary practices, then local zoning as it is known today disappears. Apartments, high rises or whatever else the federal government or a developer wants can be built on any block in America."

"HUD's power grab is based on the mistaken belief that zoning and discrimination are the same. They are not. Zoning restricts what can be built, not who lives there."

"Last month HUD finally demanded—without presenting any facts—that the county accept its conclusion that there is exclusionary zoning in Westchester as a condition of releasing the funds."

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323623304579056721426092030-lMyQjAxMTAzMDAwNjEwNDYyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email

Anonymous said...

Lynn ever heard the term retro-active? The Governer signed it in 2013, making it retro-active to 2011.

Legal Eagle said...

Postg-facto laws. For the legislature to limit any referendum rights without putting it before the people for a vote is, in my opinion, a violation of both the United States and State of Florida Constitutions. I believe either Supreme Court would uphold a rejection of these limits if a case were able to get to them.

Weetha Peebull said...

Must Listen to explanation
of HUD TAKEOVER In
Westchester NY.

Compliance Manpower hours
are OBSCENELY Expensive.

HUD uses Grant $ to intimidate!

200% Tax Hike to Pay for IT!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KZJYO2XvpM

Anonymous said...

It was on the a state wide ballot a couple of years ago? It was called Home Rule it failed.