Saturday, August 22, 2015

Baby Parts Merchant

Comment Up
Baby-parts 'harvester', Cate Dyer who is the founder and CEO of Stem Express, "yuks it up over beheaded victims." Stem Express with 1,315 percent growth over three years and revenue of $2.2 million in 2013 was ranked No. 35 on Inc.’s list of the fastest growing women-led companies in the country. And now it's harvesting baby parts. Business must be booming.

"Most people are repulsed by the idea of shipping boxes of aborted baby heads across the country. Not so this flesh merchant -- she finds it funny. Now we can watch the video of the morbid humor she hoped the court would lock away forever ..."

Read about it... on WND.com

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I too am repulsed by the thought of aborted fetuses being manipulated and crushed in ways to preserve the most valuable organs for sale. There has to be some regard for the pre-born baby.

What if the above were being done to dogs. You should be able to do whatever you want to your own dog shouldn't you? Why not go in and while aborting puppies, crunch them up so their tissue can be used in research? You'd have a mob scene on your hands.

The law is clear and women have the "right" to do whatever they wish to the life growing inside them. Many times the decision is excruciating and heart wrenching for them. Sometimes it is used for convenience and in place of contraception. Rape and incest aside, there should be more counseling and compassion for the unborn, but not criminal prosecution of the mother or doctor.

I am amazed that this practice crunching fetuses and selling baby parts doesn't offend more of the pro-abortion group.

Anonymous said...

For some people the term "anchor baby" is more offensive than the term "aborted baby".

Lynn Anderson said...

Well, liberals take offense at just about everything.

Anonymous said...

anchor babies have their life, anonymous, but aborted babies are murdered. you really want to compare the two? drop dead.

Anonymous said...

What if all potential anchor babies were being aborted? Would liberals be torn? Or would they all of a sudden become pro-lifers? Maybe they would be pro-anchor, while remaining anti-life. Save the baby only to save the anchor!

Anonymous said...

Anchor babies MATTER to liberals.Pieces of aborted babies MATTER to liberals. So what's the common denominator here? If a liberal can benefit from a baby ,dead or alive, ,they're all for it!