Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Bret Bair's hard-hitting Trump Interview

Baier Denies Charges He Colluded With DOJ Against Trump

Bret Baier's interview was hard hitting and I thought disrespectful

He continued to interrupt the President. Baire has always been a little iffy in my opinion and now that Fox is going woke left and dismissing Trump, anything is possible

Under criticism for allegations that he communicated with the Department of Justice (DOJ) before interviewing former President Donald Trump, Fox News anchor Bret Baier is denying that there was any collusion.

The highly-publicized face-to-face interview between Baire and the former president drew millions of viewers to the troubled network, but it also drew condemnation.

Baier responded to criticism that he did the work of the Department of Justice for them. One accusation asked if the host had contact with the DOJ to attempt to trap Trump into incriminating himself.

Read more...

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

i hear all these so called taped on TRUMP and cant help wondering how many are done with AI.going to be a dirty race with AI floating around

Anonymous said...

I didn't think he was disrespectful, he only has so much time for the interview, and if Trump goes on and on, and doesn't answer the questions, what is Bret supposed to do?

Trump is not paying for the time. In the long run, we are paying for it.

If you want to talk disrespectful, Matt Gaetz is your boy. Spoiled rich boy who should be in jail!

Lynn Anderson said...

@2:31...did you watch the interview?
As far as Matt Gaetz, the corrupt Justice Department went after him too for about a year and dropped the charges.
So, he should be exactly where he is, representing the First District of Florida.

Anonymous said...

It's crazy that the Deep State wasn't able to take out Matt Gaetz. It's almost as if they prosecute only those who are guilty but we know that's not true because the Deep State only goes after Republicans not Democrats...well, except for Hunter Biden...and then manufacture fake evidence to convict them.

Why didn't they do that to Gaetz? I'm so confused.

Lynn Anderson said...

The prosecutors determined that they did not have one credible witness to pursue the case.

Anonymous said...

But does that matter to the Deep State DOJ? Why not just manufacture evidence like they did against Trump? Gaetz would be a trophy for them. I don't get it.