Are we to become a cultural destination or a city of social welfare? The two concepts really are incongruent. Are we ever going to get anything right? To me, there is one big joke going on and all of us citizens are the recipients of the sick humor. None of us know where we are in the scheme of it all.
The City produces an Audit on the drop dead date required by law. Just a short while ago, I sat down to begin reading the Audit from our external auditor, Marcum/Rachlin. On the very first line of the very first table, there is an error. Does this now mean that I must check every figure on every table to see if even the math is correct? How much do we pay these guys?
On one hand, we have the CRA ready and willing to spend millions now and into the future to make this city an artist’s destination. The spiel given from the CRA to justify this plan is that art and cultural activities attract tourists which in turn will attract local and external reinvestment. Once that is done, property values will go up and the arts will be a direct result of property values increasing and more taxes to
On the other hand, we have a city hell bent on giving away city owned assets. To wit, our
Compass, on the other hand, has made major improvements to our property in order to fit their needs and what was required for occupancy. They now are asking us to take a loan out for $600,000 to make their balance sheet appear in better shape than it really is (they want to be able to attract contributors) and because they found out they had to spend more than they wanted or planned. What are our obligations? The City Commission votes along with the City Manager who had already decided to go out and get a loan…get the citizens of
There is just so much to write about regarding the inequities, the inconsistencies, the inaccuracies, the craziness, the mistakes, people not doing their jobs, the social welfare, the vision, the waste, the give-aways, that frankly, I give up--for today. The City gave up a long time ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment