Drawing before the changes
Changing land-uses and giving variances as if they were candy has always raised red flags with me especially in Lake Worth where handing out waivers has run rampant through the years. Agonizingly, we all went through this with the Gulfstream Hotel over several years by an owner who constantly jerked the city around and the P&Z complied. One even resulted in a law suit not to mention many complaints. In years gone by, the P&Z has approved of some projects with no set-backs and little green with townhouse projects sitting empty to this day.
Now we have a thoughtful Planning & Zoning Board. Unlike some other Boards within our city, the P&Z does not implement personal agendas; they work within the rules that are on the books. There are no favors to friends. Even though they personally may like a particular project or renovation that comes before them, they put all of their personal feelings aside and only concentrate on all the i's being dotted and the t's being crossed. They are looking out for your interests--the City's well being. Often times they have to approve of projects that they personally do not like or feel are not right for the neighborhood or our community overall, but because it comes under the guidelines of the P&Z and all zoning codes, they do their job and when needed, offer suggestions to make the project better.
And this is exactly what the P&Z did with Urban Lofts. The P&Z gave some very good suggestions to the CRA for its project in order to make it more appealing. The development will be located on Lucerne across and adjacent to the Shuffleboard Court building. The P&Z took a lot of heat by CRA advocates and those behind the scenes who were pushing this project through, accusing the P&Z of putting unnecessary obstacles in their path and even accusing them for wanting the project to fail and perhaps losing the NSP2 Grant. As it turned out, their suggestions were all agreed and now it is a better project which resulted in approval from the Planning & Zoning Board.
There was and still is a campaign to smear some of the volunteers on the P&Z Board suggesting that they are unqualified and were an obstacle for moving the CRA townhouse project forward. This distasteful political tactic has been happening for awhile. Uttering the sound-bite from the developer crowd, even Commissioner Andy Amoroso implied the same thing during his campaign when he said that he would never apply for the P&Z as he was unqualified. Also, Amoroso said that some members of the P&Z board are not qualified to make decisions when it raised some concerns regarding the Urban Lofts townhouses. This was quoted in the Palm Beach Post.
Certain parties do not want any obstruction, perceived or real, from our Planning & Zoning Board to achieve their ends. A big campaign ensued to ensure that the Urban Lofts project got approval and went forward from the P&Z. The CRA even hired Mark Rickards, former chair of the CRA to help promote it. The CRA has money to literally burn and it was considering anything that came its way in order to spend the Grant. The goal is to spend the money quickly and on time. They even bought the Pugh property last year located at 6th Avenue and the railroad tracks, the very same property that was in their site several years back with a plan to build affordable housing townhouses when they were paying the owner $14,000 a month in an option.
The P&Z, in the past, was dominated by planners, Realtors, developers, architects, etc. who may have had interests or friends involved in the projects that came before them. Often times they recused themselves from a vote. Some of these projects, as we all know, have resulted in foreclosure. We now have William Waters on staff who is a strong force to keep everything in perspective. His involvement should mitigate the politics behind some of the projects that come before the Board from those wanting instant or easy approval.
Developers/Investors have been standing in the wings for several years waiting for the right time to build. Some were buying up Lake Worth property buying in to what they consider strategic locations because of the LULA program. Some people even obtained a coveted real estate license.
On January 3, 2012, the Commission approved the CRA's project to construct 12 townhouses on Lucerne which will be known as Urban Arts Lofts. There were a few from the public that did not want any more failed townhouse projects. Someone from the public gave the argument that these were not townhouses but lofts, trying to deflect from the reality. Some in the neighborhood think it will be good for them and actually increase the value of their own property. That perception is no different than what many people believed in other neighborhoods where townhouses now sit empty, foreclosed or abandoned. Some went so far as to say that this project was "beautiful." If you spin it, some will believe it.
All city boards are political appointments. The CRA Board is more so than any other volunteer board in this City. There have been few exceptions to political appointments. Some believe that Wes Blackman's appointment to the P&Z Historical Preservation Board was not political. He was appointed by commissioners for whom he has never written favorably. However, it was just as political as any other appointment. As Blackman was well qualified, the Commission, wanting to tame the contentiousness, did not want to draw the ire from that side of politics. A few years ago, Blackman was also a member of the CRA and stepped down to run for commissioner.
The CRA is naturally the most sought after volunteer board position. That's where all the money is and where there's money, there is new found power that often can create "situations" and new found friends. In the past, it has even been a stepping stone for some to elected office with a few who brag, to this day, that spending $15 million on 6th Avenue South and 10th Avenue North were major accomplishments and well worth the money. They will also tell you that The Lucerne condo was one of their better decisions as well as voluntarily giving Publix one-half a million dollars to build next to Hammon Park, another failed townhouse project for which a P&Z of the past had approved.
On January 25 at 6pm the Commission will meet to discuss the future of the grounds at the shuffleboard court building where the courts are now located. One of the new "lofts" will overlook this property and of course, that developer, as well as the CRA and its friends, would most likely prefer that area to have green grass and shrubs--probably a water fountain thrown into the mix.
And as there are winners and losers, this time the developer can't lose. He will get his $4.5 to $5 million from the NSP2 government grant paid by loans from China, and the CRA will be selling the twelve, 3,000 square foot townhouses to those artists whose credit score is 550 or better and not making more than 120 percent of the area median income for Palm Beach County of $73,080 for a family of two in a neighborhood already filled with families of the working poor.
I have to wonder how these eventual new townhouse owners will afford the electric bill as these units will be 3 times larger than the average house in Lake Worth. I also wonder if in a few years the City of Lake Worth will, once again, be a loser with another uninhabited townhouse project sitting in an old section of our city. Hopefully by then, the economy will be in better shape and the city will be on its way as a destination, not only for arts but for our beach that will then be redeveloped. That is the gamble but it is, afterall, someone else's money.
30 comments:
I hope they can build these on Lucerne Ave as planned, we need more improvements on this side of the city it is so blighted and run down, something like this could really help to get more tax money for the city and also improve the blighted situation west of downtown, this is a smart move, I hope more nice development and growth can start taking place west of Dixie on Lake and Lucerne. They need to tie this downtown area in with the east side. Little by little our city just keeps getting better.
"I have to wonder how these eventual new townhouse owners will afford the electric bill as these units will be 3 times larger than the average house in Lake Worth. I also wonder if in a few years the City of Lake Worth will, once again, be a loser with another uninhabited townhouse project sitting in an old section of our city. Hopefully by then, the economy will be in better shape and the city will be on its way as a destination, not only for arts but for our beach that will then be redeveloped. That is the gamble but it is, afterall, someone else's money."
I think we need to be more optimistic and positive about this, it is a good thing and we are on our way to making Lake Worth an even greater city, we are blessed to have received this grant, you can already see the progress from it, let's have more hope!
Please point out the progress. Where is it? Building houses on 25 foot lots in the hood? Will that turn those neighborhoods around? Let's be positive, though.
Let's also hope that those who buy into this project can afford to PAY the taxes on 3,000 s.f. when they are poor.
This is not beautiful but maybe better looking than what was there. Anyone buying into the project there is also taking a gamble. No one else is.
This grant money is not going to make much difference within the city of Lake Worth. The jobs developing these houses aren't even being given to people in our city. All it's doing is attracting the very poor to live here.
I am hoping that this will improve the neighborhood and the renaissance will continue west of Dixie. Which reminds me, I liked the old name, The Cultural Renaissance rather than the big hoopla ballyhoo ending up with LULA.
Hi Lynn , I read in the paper yesterday about the city hoping to get ( more ) federal money to implement traffic calming measures, and where will the money come from to maintain this equipment into the future ????
And at the same time they want to change the building code to built more apartments and condos and raise the ceiling height to accommodate more people into this beautiful and only walkable city in palm beach county that was not built to handle all of these Automobiles !!
We cannot be green and add more automobile & more people at the same time, if only we could eliminate the federal government the planet would be a better place.
Transit oreinted developement means less cars and more people walking and biking in the city.The more people who can get around town without starting theirs cars means less carbon footprints. The things a city should seek not criticize.Don't be afraid of the height boogieman.There are studies that suggest that he may turn out to be a savior for many cities.
Anony above, do you really think getting rid of the fed govt would be a good thing? No, it would be a complete disaster. Anyone who has studied the civil war understands that one of the major reasons why the south lost the war was because of the instability of the confederacy. Furthermore, ever since Reagan started this anti-govt rehtoric(while in charge of the govt mind you) we have seen a deregulated economy run into the greatest economic ditch since the great depression due to policies on both sides of the isle starting with his administration. No doubt, the federal govt is not perfect and no doubt their is waste but to say that the complete elmination of it would be a good thing is with all do respect a load of crap.
Agenda 21. Oh no.
It was really rhetorical, Austin. Of course we need a federal govt. We just don't need its giveaways. Get rid of Democrats and we will probably improve as a nation.
Great article Lynn- and thanks for including the info re PBP and Andy
Anony that is the exact mentality that is wrong with this country. Do you not realize that our country was founded on compromise? Welfare makes up 5.5% of the budget or 191 billion dollars a mere drop in the bucket compared to other programs. The one's on welfare are the upper class. "Meanwhile, direct handouts for millionaires have included $74 million in unemployment checks, $316 million in farm subsidies, $89 million for preservation of ranches and estates, $9 billion in retirement checks and $7.5 million to compensate for damages caused by emergencies to property that should have been insured. Millionaires have even borrowed $16million in government-backed education loans to attend college since 2007." Not to mention lower taxes and lower taxes and lower taxes. Do we need to reform entitlements... yes. Do we need to reform our tax system...yes. The problem is we cannot do either unless both sides are willing to compromise.
About 14 percent of the federal budget in 2010, or $496 billion, went to support programs that provide aid (other than health insurance or Social Security benefits) to individuals and families facing hardship. I hope you're not talking about social security Austin. That is a trust fund that never should have been touched by our government for other things. Fix the loop holes in our tax Code.
The new units will be more energy efficient so the utility bills won't be as high as with the typical 60 year old Lake Worth tinder boxes.
Take a look around town. If you don't think that knocking down a bunch of delapidated vacant eyesore deathtraps is an improvement to the community you're letting your hatred of the CRA cloud your thinking and you will never get it.
Should the city have refused the grant money and left the city to get worse and worse until it's ultimate collapse from a lack of a suitable tax base?
There's a Van Morrison song called "Bright side of the road". I suggest you find a copy of it and listen to it. Over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
What EXACTLY are Linda Mahoney's and Larry Mcnamara's qualifications to be on the P&Z board?
Thanks
I agree completely Lynn. Out of that 10 percent only 5.5 percent of it is welfare (http://www.ourdime.us/102/budgetinfo/how-much-do-we-spend-on-welfare/) When I say reform entitlements, that is where we have to start "loop holes". Social Security should not be touched and should definitely not be privatized like many Republicans want and tried to do during the Bush Administration.
There's another old saying and I suggest you look it up and think about it:
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Thanks for your words of wisdom, Wes?
I am sorry that you now want to resort to the smut peddling that has been going on about certain members of this Board.
First of all, the two people for whom you mention, understand the "vision" of the residents in what they expect of their City--a low profile community which will be invaluable in the years to come.
Lynda studies everything thoroughly before her as does Laurence McNamara. Lynda was a member of SAC and is totally aware of the city vision.
They are both highly ethical and have nothing but the betterment of this city in mind. They will not be compromised by development for development sake.
I would suggest that you listen to their interviews in order to understand why they are just perfect for the P&Z.
No more corrupt people on this board. Isn't that a relief. The good ole boys club wants back in so they can continue to do the dirty. It took the city a long time to get rid of them here and then one election because of a fire tax got them back into power. Sad day for LW.
It is true. Can you even imagine Obama appointing someone opposed to his agenda? Can you imagine Scott Maxwell doing that either? Hell no. He just fires you. Doesn't happen and it never should have happened in LW either. The commission had power and failed to use it.
The boards are political and as such, Blackman never should have been appointed by this past commission. It never would have happened under Jennings. She had some political smarts. You always pack the boards with those who think like you or support your agenda. If Wes were on the Commission he never would have appointed Panagioti to the CRB as an example. Nothing personal about Wes. He is simply a different side of politics. You don't appoint the "enemy" no matter how qualified they might be. As a commission, it needs to be much more politically astute. I can guarantee that this new commission will not be as naive. The power has shifted so watch out.
In the meantime, we will have new townhouses near the railroad tracks catering to poor people. hahahaha. The city is looking for tax base. There won't be any here.
I thought I heard that there was some sort of law being talked about to not allow professionals on city boards. Do you know anything about that?
In 2010, the BCE removed requirements that professionals be appointed to the P&Z Board. This allowed people like Cara and Lynda to be appointed. Their qualifications? They were appointed to the SAC which set the "vision" for the city.
This vision for a low rise city that has a history of multi story buildings AND a Charter Amendment passed by tax paying voting residents of Lake Worth to keep 6 story height limit East of Dixie and allow up to 10 stories West of Dixie was ignored by these visionaries.
So now we have these idiotic 2 story limits and even Publix had to design it's building in Art Deco (box) design to stay within the limit instead of their Key West style buildings. Don't get me wrong; I like what we ended up with, but it could have been nicer for us if the height restrictions had not been shoved down our throats by these visionaries.
Removing the professional requirements from this board was a huge step backwards and Cara tries to stop ANY development. She did her best to try to stop the Artist Lofts (which are not townhouses as they have no living space on the first floor) but because the CRA brought the design to the board beforehand to get their input, and spent thousands of dollars to change the designs several times, we "now have a better project".
Cara wanted to save the slum houses on Lake and Lucerne that are now low rent rentals. She wanted to know how many houses the CRA had demolished in the entire NSP area. Why was that relevant to the approval of this project?
The P&Z board needs to be combined back with the Historical Preservation Board, which still has requirements that people serving must know what they are talking about.
The CRA hasn't demolished enough houses in the slum area yet.
I question your definition of a townhouse. This project has been referred to as townhouses ever since they were first presented.
1.A tall, narrow, traditional row house, generally having three or more floors.
A townhouse is one of a row of homes sharing common walls. People own the land beneath the townhouse. There can also be common elements, such as a central courtyard, that would have shared ownership.
So, perhaps the distinction then is, no HO association where these individual owners will be paying dues. And that will even make the project worse.
As far as Cara goes, she is just as smart and qualified than anyone else. You don't have to be a professional to be qualified to know and understand what the people want for their city. She is a former commissioner and understand LW very well. I do NOT want high-rises here but it is people such as yourself that are forcing this issue. We like our city small, not Ft. Lauderdale or anything the least bit similar.
These are townhouses. Look at the back-up. Two floor plans were presented - 1 has a studio space downstairs. And 1 has the master bedroom.
Enter through the front door directly into the master bedroom! They were also presented under the regulations of the townhouse ordinance.
Two floor plans were made because the CRA was told to make them in case the "loft" idea doesn't pan out. The CRA's intention was always to have the living space on the second floor. There originally was a roof-top component for roof top green space component. There were comments from the P&Z board that they didn't like that. They didn't want music going into the adjacent neighborhood from the rooftops which was fine due to the cost of making the roof walkable.
Town houses have a generally negative connotation when used here in Lake Worth. Most ALL townhouse communities have had living space on the bottom floor along with the garage. Yes they are connected, but again, the CRA was advised by staff to break up the buildings so they don't LOOK so connected. They also eliminated one unit due to Cara's whining about how she wanted more green space and permeable area.
And when they did what she wanted.... she still came back and said she wanted the vacant blighted lots to remain "green space".
Thank God there are more level headed (and qualified) people on the board.
Cara debated and presented her point of view. To always call someone a "whiner" becasue they differ in an idea from yours, is really unfair, don't you think?
The P&Z's ideas were good ones and the project now looks much better than when it was first presented. Do you even agree with that statement?
As far as the rooftop component, I totally agree with that one of the P&Z. Glad they said "no."
Post a Comment