Thursday, April 5, 2012

Common Sense Decision by Lake Worth Planning board

Comment Up
A typical look of a TD Bank

Last night I wandered down to the Planning & Zoning board meeting. My curiosity had the best of me because of all the latest political hype in requiring "qualifications" of its members, something that has always been standard operational procedure as well as common sense when considering appointments to the various boards.

Every now and then a board appointee will slip through the cracks but overall, those serving on city boards are highly qualified and professional. Official professional qualifications to be a member of the P&Z are non-specific. There used to be qualifications when the P&Z was also the Historical Preservation Board and qualifications are, I believe, required by Statute. Once these boards separated, qualifications for P&Z were officially lifted in 2010. This requirement is now changing in the future due to political pressure.

This Planning & Zoning Board is a cross section of citizens doing an outstanding job for Lake Worth. Highly ethical, knowledgeable and fully informed, how can anyone say or really believe that they are anti-business? How can anyone say that they are not cognizant of our Building Code and Ordinances? How can anyone say that they don't have common sense when it is needed? Last night dispelled the myths and proved their case.

Toronto-Dominion Bank headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with more than 85,000 employees in offices around the world and its subsidiaries are collectively known as TD Bank Group (TD). TD offers a full range of financial products and services to approximately 21.5 million customers worldwide through four key business lines. TD Bank is one of the 10 largest banks in the U.S., with more than 25,000 employees and deep roots in the community dating back more than 150 years and they have been trying to be a part of our community for the last two years.

Last night they were there to ask the P&Z for three variances in order to obtain a green certification as they do not build any building that would not be certified "green." What is a LEED (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design) building? It's a green building certified by the US Green Building Council and TD Bank is going for the platinum certification in Lake Worth.

With retail operations posting a record of $5.7 billion in 2011, this bank recently gave its shareholders a 4 cents per share raise. They posted $6.3 billion in adjusted income – 20 per cent growth over last year – despite ongoing macroeconomic challenges and market volatility. This is exactly what Lake Worth wants in its town--successful businesses that will create jobs and help with our tax base.

Specifically, the applicant was proposing to shift the 2,900 square foot bank building 5.04 feet to the north and 1.38 feet to the east. The drive-through section of 594 square feet is on a separate parcel and will not be affected by the variance request. The proposed building’s relocation results in the placement of the building being non-conforming with regard to the following three sections of the City’s zoning code:
  • Section 23.21.07.05 with respect to the placement of the building within the “VisibilityTriangle” at the corner of North Dixie Highway and 2nd Avenue North;
  • Section 23.13.04.03.B.1 with respect to the side street setback along 2nd Avenue North not meeting the minimum required setback; and
  • Section 23.20.02.04 to with respect to the Dixie Highway and 2nd Avenue North setbacksnot matching, which is required by the design guidelines for major thoroughfares.

The bank project was previously approved at the July 6, 2011 meeting by the Planning & Zoning Board. However, during the process, the bank discovered a conflict with the Florida Building Code thus they were back before the P&Z for variances that would ensure their success to build. Last night they got the go ahead by the P&Z on a 5/1 vote approving the variance request.

It was all just common sense in the end and a good decision for Lake Worth by the Planning & Zoning Board.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

TD Bank would be a welcome addition to the area. Just curious, who was the dissenting vote?

Lynn Anderson said...

Jennings

Anonymous said...

Oh.
What was her reason?

Anonymous said...

The non-political appointee they dropped the qualifications requirement in 2010 for.

Let me guess...Her argument is that she wants the corner of Dixie and 2nd to be green space and a park for indigent and indigenous people. Plus she could never cast a vote FOR a bank.

Before I clicked to read the comments, I knew she was the dissenting vote.

Anonymous said...

And TD Bank offered to pay for the city's plan for 2nd Ave North from J to Federal Highway.

Lynn Anderson said...

At one point, the variance looked like it was going south. At the end, right before the vote, the lawyer for TD came back with the offer to pay for the striping and repaving of 2nd Ave North from J St to Federal Highway. Good move on TD's part.

Anonymous said...

"she could never cast a vote FOR a bank". Good thing Jennings decisions are made based on what's best for the city and not her own personal agenda.

Anonymous said...

The vote was 5 to 1. I guess the other 4 got it wrong, huh?

Anonymous said...

Ah yes. If only we could have board members who all think and vote exactly alike. Wouldn't the city be so much better then? If intelligent people like Cara Jennings would just stop asking questions and requiring public benefit for variance FAVORS.
Thank goodness the new commission majority understands how inefficient it is to demand good development that complies with our zoning code. Hopefully they'll get rid of these unqualified people so we can get more banks and convenience stores and pawn shops and storage facilities. Like the last bunch of qualified professionals brought us.

Anonymous said...

Cara did not say 'she could not vote for a bank.
She voted against it for the safety issue of building in the visibility triangle vs. making the building fit the site.

Listen to the audio.

Anonymous said...

What was not said but should have been said was--You're a multi-billion dollar bank so redesign your freaking plans.

BRH said...

The issue regarding the visibility triangle is an interesting one. Our code sets an arbitrary 20' visibility triangle on all situations. This does not match with state and federal regulations. There are several things about this particular visibilty triangle that are not taken into consideration in our code. This intersection is controlled by a stop light and there is a right hand turn lane directly in front of the property which pushes the corner back. FDOT (state) and federal regulations have different requirements for a intersection controlled by a stop light, but no the LW code. It seems that the LW code should be consistent with FDOT and federal code. Waters said that the City did not have a traffic engineer determine the limit put into our code.

Anonymous said...

Lynn your confusing me, under this post,you say a good decision by the planning board. On your post two day's earlier, you say just say No.The poor guy on West Lake Avenue. Are you for waivers, or against waivers?

Lynn Anderson said...

I would say that it definitely does not take much to confuse you...go back to 2nd grade. What poor guy on Lake Avenue? You mean the guy who will now sell beer in open containers to all the illegal immigrants in that area? That guy? You mean woman who is a friend of the Queen of Mean, that Realtor? :)
Go beat up your mother, will ya?