Comment Up
What ObamaCare is Really About
I'm a 54 year old consulting engineer and make between $60,000 and $125,000 per
year, depending on how hard I work and whether or not there are work projects
out there for me.
My girlfriend is 61 and makes about $18,000 per year, working as a part-time
mail clerk.
For me, making $60,000 a year, under ObamaCare, the cheapest, lowest grade
policy I can buy, which also happens to impose a $5,000 deductible, costs $482
per month.
For my girlfriend, the same exact policy, same deductible, costs $1 per month.
That's right, $1 per month. I'm not making this up.
Don't believe me? Just go to
http://www.coveredca.com/ , the
ObamaCare website for California and enter the parameters I've mentioned above
and see for yourself. By the way, my zip code is 93940. You'll need to enter
that.
So OK, clearly ObamaCare is a scheme that involves putting the cost burden of healthcare
onto the middle and upper-income wage earners. But there's a lot more to it.
Stick with me.
And before I make my next points, I'd like you to think about something:
I live in Monterey County, in Central California. We have a large land mass but
just 426,000 residents - about the population of Colorado Springs or the city
of Omaha.
But we do have a large Hispanic population, including a large number of illegal
aliens, and to serve this group we have Natividad Medical Center, a massive,
Federally subsidized county medical complex that takes up an area about
one-third the size of the Chrysler Corporation automobile assembly plant in
Belvedere, Illinois (see Google Earth View). Natividad has state-of-the-art
operating rooms, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fully
equipped, 24 hour emergency room, and much more. If you have no insurance, if
you've been in a drive-by shooting or have overdosed on crack cocaine, this is
where you go. And it's essentially free, because almost everyone who ends up in
the ER is uninsured.
Last year, 2,735 babies were born at Natividad. 32% of these were born to
out-of-wedlock teenage mothers, 93% of which were Hispanic. Less than 20% could
demonstrate proof of citizenship, and 71% listed their native language as
Spanish. Of these 876 births, only 40 were covered under [any kind of] private
health insurance. The taxpayers paid for the other 836. And in case you were
wondering about the entire population - all 2,735 births - less than 24%
involved insured coverage or even partial payment on behalf of the patient to
the hospital in exchange for services. Keep this in mind as we move forward.
Now consider this:
If I want to upgrade my policy to a low-deductible premium policy, such as what
I had with my last employer, my cost is $886 per month. But my girlfriend can
upgrade her policy to the very same level, for just $4 per month. That's right,
$4 per month. $48 per year for a zero-deductible, premium healthcare policy -
the kind of thing you get when you work at IBM (except of course, IBM employees
pay an average of $170 per month out of pocket for their coverage).
I mean, it's bad enough that I will be forced to subsidize the ObamaCare scheme
in the first place. But even if I agreed with the basic scheme, which of course
I do not, I would
never agree to subsidize premium policies. If I have
to pay $482 a month for a budget policy, I sure as hell do not want the guy I'm
subsidizing to get a better policy, for less that 1% of what I have to fork out
each month for a low-end policy.
Why must I pay $482 per month for something the other guy
gets for a dollar? And why should the other guy get to buy an $886 policy for
$4 a month? Think about this: I have to pay $10,632 a year for the same thing
that the other guy can get for $48. $10,000 of net income is 60 days of full
time work as an engineer. $48 is something I could pay for collecting
aluminum cans and plastic bottles, one day a month.
Are you with me on this? Are you starting to get an idea what ObamaCare is
really about?
ObamaCare is not about dealing with inequities in the healthcare system. That's
just the cover story. The real story is that it is a massive, political power
grab. Do you think anyone who can insure himself with a premium policy for $4 a
month will vote for anyone but the political party that provides him such a
deal? ObamaCare is about enabling, subsidizing, and expanding the Left's
political power base, at taxpayer expense. Why would I vote for anyone but a
Democrat if I can have babies for $4 a month? For that matter, why would I go
to college or strive for a better job or income if it means I have to pay real
money for healthcare coverage? Heck, why study engineering when I can be a
schlub for $20K per year and buy a new F-150 with all the money I'm saving?
And think about those $4-a-month babies - think in terms of propagation models.
Think of just how many babies will be born to irresponsible, under-educated
mothers. Will we get a new crop of brain surgeons and particle physicists from
the dollar baby club, or will we need more cops, criminal courts and prisons?
One thing you can be certain of: At $4 a month, they'll multiply, and multiply,
and multiply. And not one of them will vote Republican.
ObamaCare: It's all about political power.
Note: This is circulating the Internet and I thought it interesting to re-post here.
I know everyone is focusing on a Hillary Clinton run for president in
2016 but be wary of sleight of hand. The insidious far left progressive
socialists are drunk with election success. America has given them our
country and its largest city to be led by individuals whose ideology and
beliefs are completely antithetical to our Constitutional Republic.
