Trump’s attorneys had argued his possessory interest in the property seized during the Mar-a-Lago raid gave him standing to press a Fourth Amendment case that the material was unlawfully seized.
The Court rejected that argument.
“Huge revelation from the 11th Circuit’s opinion tonight: FBI seized over 1800 ‘other items’ that were not documents. The mention of the “1,800 other items” raises other troubling questions about the scope of the Mar-a-Lago raid and whether what was seized went beyond what the government claimed it was looking for.
No comments:
Post a Comment