Don't forget P&Z. Oh, that's right, you did. When the fervor was about several other members of city boards that 'must' resign, amazingly Mr. Rinaldi, the all powerful chair of P&Z was mysteriously left out of the rants. Hmm, seems odd. Everyone else on a city board who has commented on the issue was named, except Mr. Rinaldi (who I personally like, btw). I wonder why that could be. It seems to me like consistency is not certain peoples' strong suit.
I would love to hear an explanation as to why he can comment on the matter without calls on this blog for his resignation, but others may not.
Ok, forget it. I'll just save us all the time and suspense. It's because HE'S AGAINST THE BOND.
By your logic, the many, many people who have come out for the bond can never get a fair shake in front of P & Z (which to help you out a bit here, encompasses far more area than Historic Board) due to Mr. Rinaldi's position on the bond.
Mr. Bully, I don't recall that I ever mentioned anyone by name. But now that you brought up Mr. Rinaldi, one thing that I can say about him is--he is NOT a sick, sorry guy. We agree on one issue--that's it, and I am very much aware of that. However, he doesn't write a blog and personally attack people with the most disgusting of comments in order to ridicule and be cruel. He would not allow any decision of his to be personal because he is an intelligent HUMAN BEING. That's where he does stand out and differs from you perhaps?
3 comments:
We also have a few losers on city boards. One particular chair comes to my mind, the HRPB. Can you even imagine going before this person?
Don't forget P&Z. Oh, that's right, you did. When the fervor was about several other members of city boards that 'must' resign, amazingly Mr. Rinaldi, the all powerful chair of P&Z was mysteriously left out of the rants. Hmm, seems odd. Everyone else on a city board who has commented on the issue was named, except Mr. Rinaldi (who I personally like, btw). I wonder why that could be. It seems to me like consistency is not certain peoples' strong suit.
I would love to hear an explanation as to why he can comment on the matter without calls on this blog for his resignation, but others may not.
Ok, forget it. I'll just save us all the time and suspense. It's because HE'S AGAINST THE BOND.
By your logic, the many, many people who have come out for the bond can never get a fair shake in front of P & Z (which to help you out a bit here, encompasses far more area than Historic Board) due to Mr. Rinaldi's position on the bond.
Mr. Bully, I don't recall that I ever mentioned anyone by name. But now that you brought up Mr. Rinaldi, one thing that I can say about him is--he is NOT a sick, sorry guy. We agree on one issue--that's it, and I am very much aware of that. However, he doesn't write a blog and personally attack people with the most disgusting of comments in order to ridicule and be cruel. He would not allow any decision of his to be personal because he is an intelligent HUMAN BEING. That's where he does stand out and differs from you perhaps?
Post a Comment