Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Analysis Found That Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won In 2020

A recent analysis of mail-in ballot fraud in the 2020 election suggests that Donald Trump might have secured victory if not for the significant increase in mail-in voting.

The study, conducted by the Heartland Institute, an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank, delved into the impact of fraudulent mail-in ballots on both Trump and Joe Biden, based on emerging evidence of widespread irregularities in the voting process.

Examining data from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey, the study found that approximately one in five mail-in voters admitted to engaging in potentially fraudulent actions. This included activities such as completing a ballot for a friend or family member, signing a ballot on behalf of someone else, or having a ballot filled out by another person.

The surge in mail-in voting in 2020 marked a historic high in U.S. electoral history, with over 43 percent of ballots being cast by mail. Notably, a majority of these mail-in ballots favored Joe Biden. Had the election followed the traditional in-person voting model, Trump would likely have secured reelection, according to the study’s authors.

Read about it...