The New York Times formulated a policy two years ago that said one of three top editors had to review and sign off on articles that depend primarily on information from unnamed sources. But in this case, they know the source and obviously trust him. It still could end up as a bomb that could explode unexpectedly and damage The Times and whatever credibility that they have left.
Conservative Commentary/Opinion on Local, State & National issues. Hours 6am to 7pm to respond to comments
Friday, September 7, 2018
New York Times and Anonymous Op-Ed-writer
It's unbelievable that the NY Times would publish an Op-Ed piece with no name attached. And his comments are based on what facts? Major newspapers almost never publish unnamed op-ed pieces. The author was said to be speaking from his own personal ethics and conscience. If he really was ethical, he would have resigned.
The New York Times formulated a policy two years ago that said one of three top editors had to review and sign off on articles that depend primarily on information from unnamed sources. But in this case, they know the source and obviously trust him. It still could end up as a bomb that could explode unexpectedly and damage The Times and whatever credibility that they have left.
The New York Times formulated a policy two years ago that said one of three top editors had to review and sign off on articles that depend primarily on information from unnamed sources. But in this case, they know the source and obviously trust him. It still could end up as a bomb that could explode unexpectedly and damage The Times and whatever credibility that they have left.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
There's a reason you've never been a lawyer.
Are you a lawyer, @3:56. Even your opinion/argument is just one decided by a judge. Arrogant.
Post a Comment