Reverse Gentrification

Will we let it happen in Lake Worth Beach?

Residents Explain the Impacts of RV Encampments in Their Community

Guest Blogger who responds to the homeless situation

Dan Volker, Lake Worth Beach

The guy in the video says the solutions begin with neighborhood groups forming, and being very vocal about Homeless issues, and by bringing lawsuits occasionally when needed to keep town government interest up.

I think we need a cause most people in Lake worth or West Palm can get behind---that Families have a RIGHT to buy a home in a "neighborhood" that is culturally or socioeconomically aligned with their own backgrounds and general behaviors.

• 1. It is fair to say that bad neighborhoods DO EXIST, and these typically involved many criminals living within these areas and preying on their neighbors. Obvious examples exist in Lake Worth and can be validated by the Sheriff's office.

• 2. It is fair to say that a mother and father have a Moral DUTY to attempt to have a HOME in a neighborhood that is low in crime, and high in good moral values.

o Families have a right to buy a home in an area where there are cultures known to be homogeneous or non-competitive with their own. This is reactive to our knowledge that there are cultures that believe in destroying other cultures, such as Hamas or Palestinian cultures which have shown they believe it is good to attack Jewish or Israeli people or cultures. Similarly, this relates to a low-class criminal, believing that it is good to target a specific race or neighborhood as ideal to steal from.

o Good mothers and fathers have a duty to their children to attempt to AVOID neighborhoods where such criminal and anti-cultural crimes take place, and Towns SHOULD BE HELD LIABLE for actions by the town and its law enforcement, that would obviously degrade a good neighborhood that families have “bought into” with life savings or major financial commitments, in order to protect the future of their children and family in general.

3. Neighborhoods should have attorneys and funds raised to pursue this form of legal protection.

• 4. We could call this a "Reverse Gentrification Lawsuit," where bad actions -- or NO Actions by a Town, can be shown to destroy personal investments and to be destructive to the culture and family protections provided by good neighborhoods.

• 5. We need to assert that families have a right to live in good neighborhoods if they can afford to and that families have a right to desire to live in a safe, low crime neighborhood with other people holding similar American cultural values.

o This suggests that an influx of illegal aliens into a “good neighborhood” from a nation that is either collectivist, or counter-culture (with piracy as a preferred way of life), is something that a Town, City or State has an absolute duty to protect against. The duty of the Government is to keep legal families living in good neighborhoods, safe; This duty is a Categorical Imperative, while the “obligation” to find a place for displaced aliens or the Homeless is a lesser duty, and one that is eliminated when it conflicts with the Categorical Imperative Duty of protecting good American neighborhoods.

o Allowing tent cities and homeless encampments in good neighborhoods violates the implied duty of government to protect good neighborhoods from crime and against reverse gentrification.