DNA Links Suspect to Kirk Assassination, Note Recovered
DNA evidence matching that of Charlie Kirk’s suspected killer was found at the crime scene, FBI Director Kash Patel said on Sept. 15.Tyler Robinson, the suspect arrested for the Sept. 10 assassination of the conservative Christian influencer at Utah Valley University, also left a note expressing that he had an opportunity to kill Kirk, Patel said.
In a Sept. 15 interview with Fox News, Patel said, “I can report today that the DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for the suspect in custody.”
Patel also referred to reports of an alleged note left behind by Robinson, saying that the suspect wrote that he had the “opportunity to take out” Kirk and wrote, “I’m going to take it.” That message was written before the Sept. 10 shooting, he said.
Patel said that it was both a “note” and a “text message exchange,“ adding that it was ”destroyed“ but that investigators recovered it. Other evidence in the case, Patel said, was ”shocking,” although he didn’t go into more detail.
Read more...
4 comments:
Well I don't think hating canceling or murdering someone is correct or Godly! It is against the ten commandments. But also in Matthew 7 it says not to judge and Charlie did pontificate a lot and was quite judgmental and critical of a lot of people and a lot of people don't like judgment and criticism anymore today and they don't want people to call out people sins. So you have to realize that he did really piss off a lot of people, of course it's not correct to kill him. And it was horrible what they did to him. But he also was very judgmental of many people and sat up on his high horse in his Ivory Tower acting like he knew more or was more upright or holy than others and really in this day and age he really shouldn't be doing that at all! As humans we really shouldn't be judging others and we should leave all of that up to God!
Charlie Kirk was an opinion maker who gave people the facts of the matters at hand. I would not call him judgmental towards the people he was addressing, just their lack of knowledge of the truth. He was there to set it straight and give them unfound knowledge that many had never thought of. He was a very religious man
I doubt that he was any more religious than any other ordinary person who goes to church and who is christian. If you're really religious you shouldn't be even pontificating or judging or criticizing or offering opinion or judgment or advice to other people because it comes across as being critical and can be considered negative or hurtful when you point out people sins and I think that's what's happened in this case although it's not right what happened it's very sad but I think people have to be careful about that we've seen priests who ignore and won't even talk to their prisoners outside of church before and they're supposed to be religious and holy too but their actual Behavior doesn't make them look very holy at all. Pope Francis was a pope and was supposed to be the holiest of holy and we saw a lot of disgrace and bad things that he did like slapping a lady on the hand one time when she went to kiss his ring or finger so I think we have to be careful about putting anyone on a pedestal other than God or Jesus!
@6:50...don't necessarily agree with your statements.
Post a Comment