Thursday, December 12, 2019

Trump campaign Spied On

Bill Barr Confirms This Was ‘First Time In History’ A ‘Presidential Campaign’ Was Spied On

It happened and it was egregious. There is no doubt about it, whatsoever. The 2016 Trump campaign was spied on. That much is 100% certain. And it is historic. Here’s what’s up, straight from the lips of Bill Barr--

Read about it...

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

So, no it didn't happen.

The DOJ IG specifically answered "no" to that question posed to him yesterday.

It's on tape.

It's in the hearing transcripts.

Barr saying this shows that he's more interested in defending Trump than he is about telling the truth.

Those who repeat Barr's words (knowing that they are false) are in the same boat.

It's that simple.

Lynn Anderson said...

Horowitz said that there are 17 "significant inaccuracies and omissions" in the FBI's handling of FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) applications to surveil Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aide, and found that "the surveillance of Carter Page continued even as the FBI gathered information that weakened the assessment of probable cause." He did not want to use the word "spy" but did say that the motivations were unclear.
Wait until the Durham investigation comes out.

Anonymous said...

There were mistakes made in the FISA application process. The IG and the FBI itself has admitted that.

That does not mean that the "presidential campaign" was spied on. They're two different things.

The man who conducted the review of the FBI said definitely yesterday that there was no spying. It's a fact. No matter how many bloggers say otherwise, there was no spying.

Lynn Anderson said...

@9:15 In your opinion however in my opinion, there was.

Anonymous said...

Well, of course...that's my point.

Your opinion (and Barr's for that matter) is not based on facts. It's based upon a desire to create a narrative that vindicates and protects Trump.

It's like you saying, "The moon was not full last night." Someone whips out a Farmer's Almanac and says, "Well, in fact it was a full moon." And then you say, "Not in my opinion."

Anyone is entitled to their opinion, of course. But most people choose to base their opinions on facts and reality. To do otherwise is bordering on being delusional, particularly when you know what the facts are.

Anonymous said...

how many of these dems are writing books full of LIES right now

Lynn Anderson said...

@9:56...decided to post your ridiculous comment. Now you believe you are smarter than the Attorney General of the United States. LOL. Great stuff.
Incidentally, the full Moon is tonight. Check on that one too, ok.

Anonymous said...

LOL. The moon was an example I thought you might be able to understand...but apparently I was wrong.

I don't believe I'm smarter than Barr, but I did hear what the DOJ IG testified to yesterday under oath. If you were to take the time to look into it, you would already know that Barr has publicly expressed disagreement with the IG's findings and that this is unprecedented in U.S. history.

It's Barr's view versus the DOJIG...and the IG is a non-partisan whereas Barr is a political appointee. I'll believe Horowitz over Barr and I totally understand why you and other Trump supporters choose Barr. But that doesn't negate that one is associated with facts and reality and the other one is a protection of Trump.

Lynn Anderson said...

You‘re wrong about most everything. Tell ya what and I’ve mentioned this before, write your own blog. Tired of you using mine for your liberal propaganda.

Anonymous said...

It's getting more like Pakistan here every day!

Anonymous said...

It's all so incredibly boring. Who watches it? What are they learning? It's payback for Clinton. Can't believe they get a paycheck for this.

Anonymous said...

Write your own blog! Who does blogs anymore, what year is it, 1998? Blog! Lol! Sad! Make Blogging Great Again!

Lynn Anderson said...

What's sad--YOU. LOL.
If no one is interested in blogs, why do you continue to come over here?
Why do I now have over 100,000 views a month?

Anonymous said...

"Why do I now have over 100,000 views a month?"

Post some proof, Lynn. The way you falsify and mold your comments, your "polls," your years-old information, and your demonstrably false and crazy conspiracy theories give you no credibility whatsoever.

Russian bots love Americans who are doing Putin's work. I would love to see how many foreign visitors you get here.

Lynn Anderson said...

Overwhelming the United States--Wes! and guess what, I don't have to prove a damn thing to you!

Recent countries:

United States 28392

Ukraine 5873 (fighting Russia and certainly NOT doing Putin's work)

Indonesia 831

Unknown Region 136

Germany 82

France 52

Romania 39

Portugal 31

Canada 28

United Kingdom 24

Lynn Anderson said...

Pageviews last month

126,840