Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Lake Worth's 2020 - Hell or High Water - Going with the odds

Comment Up
Sign built on taxpayer money to "sell" the LW 2020 plan?

Does it say on the sign "Paid political advertisement?" Is the city registered as a political action committee... do they have to promote the "fors" and the "against" when it comes to a ballot initiative? When I talk about the "against," I am talking about the term and the cost of the debt.

First of all folks, it's a 'vision' filled with dogged tenacity by this commission and if you disagree, the odds are you will be ostracized. The odds are stacked against you on any initiative put forward by a local government  because most of them pass. Even when the voters WON an election in 2013 and told them what we thought, our politicians told us to drop dead using tax dollars and the city's legal department to come up with a law that was signed three months after the election that reverted back to 2011.

This commission is betting on their vision by playing the odds. They need your cash. The city needs the cash even more. Winning is all in the strategy and in the language and on top of all of that, the city has the money to spend on its success...your tax dollars working against you, if you will.  Even though our highly informed residents in Lake Worth know we need some road improvements, they are wondering if we need $63.2 million worth right now for a bond that really costs $131 million.. Do we really need to vote them ALL this money at once? I believe that the majority of the electorate is being very cautious regarding this huge debt along with its term. They know it's so much more than the cost of a hamburger. Stupid, we're not.

The one thing that the city did do throughout this process, was change some of the numbers, some of the strategy.  They learned through their mistakes and listened to the criticism that they were getting from their political friends. The rest of us, forget about it.  The one thing that all of us learned throughout the process is that the bond referendum is going forward in August, hell or high water.  This could possibly be the lowest turn-out in history for a vote of this magnitude but it's anyone's guess.

The city is counting on low turn-out and therefore they have reached out to those who always take an interest in what's going on. They have appealed to demographic areas that need roads by erecting signs. They have conducted community meetings where a possible 200 people total turned out all over the city in order to spread their word. They know that very few people ever turn out for meetings and are apathetic but they can say, in all good conscience, we held the meetings for all who were interested--we did our bit.

Many in our community don't read the daily newspaper nor do they go to the Lake Worth web site and have no idea that they soon could be in more million dollar debt with a tax increase for 30 years.  The city is urging their political cronies to spread their word throughout the community and are hoping for their help to bring the vote home. They, more than likely, have even come down hard on the local media to go softer on Lake Worth when reporting the dilapidated houses, the slum and the blight and to give them a break. You can witness this on Channel 12 as its direction has changed. It's the "poor Lake Worth" syndrome..."give them a break; they are trying." Through these probable and likely appeals, they have stifled the press and have received a positive editorial from the Palm Beach Post.

Everything is going their way...they are appealing to the pot-hole mentality not the long-term consequences of tremendous debt--living on ad-valorem taxes of $5,646,125. There is no more time for them to answer the hard questions if they even knew the answers.

24 comments:

  1. Boy ! Talk about counting your chickens before they're hatched! What will the spoiled brats do if we tell them NO ? Stop our garbage pickup? Because that's the only bang for our buck that my highly taxed neighborhood gets for our money.That and the occasional Sheriffs car that drives by (not INTO ) our neighborhood every month or so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's hard to repair the mismanagement of past City Commissions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I suppose so--like Clemens, Vespo and Lowe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That project is not part of the bond issue. I don't recall where the money is coming from but it is existing money. You need to check into this becasue you are so wrong here.

    ReplyDelete
  5. According to Maxwell, he is the first Commissioner in our 100 year history to get it right ! LOL. Wish I was making this up ,,,,,

    ReplyDelete
  6. The sign has been there for 6 plus months

    ReplyDelete
  7. That was definitely GOOD strategy!

    ReplyDelete
  8. How about the sign with the artist rendering and the site plan of the beach complex while it was being built? It had all the elected at that time on it too. Was that a paid political advertisement?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good try but you have missed the point--

    The beach redevelopment was NOT a vote of the people. The infrastructure general obligation bond will be a vote of the people and as such, all facts need to be out in the open.

    This blog had nothing to do with the names on a sign.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don’t know were that sign is. Looks to me like that sign might be for the 12th Ave. S project that has nothing to do with the proposed 2020 plan. The money for the 12th Ave S project is money that the city had allocated years ago. Lynn, you go to most of the commission meetings. You’re certainly aware of that project.

    ReplyDelete
  11. the sign speaks for itself

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's no wonder why this city is in so much trouble. You guys, anonymous at 1:33, like to argue on just about anything and everything. Now it's what's printed on a sign.

    This sign is certainly left to interpretation. No where does it state it is NOT part of the LW 2020. No where does it state it is part of CDBG funds. We are not mind readers out here on what road infrastructure they are talking about since the LW 2020 is in e very part of our city.

    The mayor states: The 10th Ave S project is being paid for with the $750,000 that was found in unspent CDBG funds from 2006. It has nothing to do with 2020. Construction should start in June.

    ReplyDelete

  13. Sign built on taxpayers money to “sell” the LW 2020 plan. Stay tune to CBS 12 for all your LW award winning news coverage.

    ReplyDelete
  14. anyone in their right miond or who has a mind would normally believe that this is the infrastructure program wehre the city wantgs a ton of money. I think it is.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The city should stop putting stuff on the Consent Agenda and have some transparency...let us know what's going on :)

    The agreement authorizes $325,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to reconstruct 10th
    Avenue South between South A and South E Streets The CDBG funds from previous years will be used for this
    project. It is estimated that the cost for the project will be $310,075 plus a contingency amount of $14,925. In
    addition, the City budgeted $37,000 from its Roadway Improvements Funds for engineering and design services.
    There are no additional matching funds required.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Aside from the sign, Lynn has admitted that it is in reference to CDBG funds. She researched it and admitted to that fact but the sign is certainly coincidental to the bond. So now, concentrate on the rest of the content that does apply instead of proving that you are a guy with a noodle.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 9:17am...You left out Romano, Ramiccio, and Allen.

    Also Mulvehill, Golden and Jennings!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Lynn,

    This started way before LW2020 was even a sparkle in the City Manager's and Commission's eyes. When I first moved into Lake Worth in 2010 I approached Mayor Varela, Cara, Joan, Retha, Suzanne about this gross negligence of three major avenues that go from A Street up to Dixie and/or E Streets and they all gave me this answer "Mark there isn't enough money in the budget right now for road paving". I was taken aback to find out there were funds when I walked these very "third world looking avenues" with our then Public Services Director Joe Kroll who tried numerous times to get this issue on the agenda and address and he was shot down by our City Manager at the time Susan Stanton. I then rode through this area with our new Public Services Director Jamie Brown and he committed to trying his best and that brings us to present day. I am ecstatic that not only is 10th Avenue South being paved FINALLY but that there is a gorgeous beautification project presentation of what is planned for the other avenues that aren't paved either. I believe that 7th avenue south is next I already have seen engineers out there taking measurements. Let's celebrate that things that have been ignored for decades are finally getting done in some of the worst pockets of our city with the lowest voter turn out. In the past no politician thought it politically worth it to invest in this area because it is, historically, one of the lowest in voter turn out. I am glad to see that the present majority of this commission isn't playing that game. Let's let the voters decide about the bond if it passes it will be because, we the people, said yea or nay. Let's not hang our local government out to dry for trying their hardest to make tough unpopular suggestions ONLY to correct historical long time negligence of past local governments for decades. When we had such a huge surplus and money was rolling in we were spending it like we had a money tree farm but NOT on community benefit and infrastructure projects. The proof of that is in plain view in many of our neighborhoods.

    Sincerely,
    Mark A. Parrilla

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mark--that IS a long time ago!!

    It is just a big coincidence that this is going to start, right after the bond gets put on the ballot. The "game" as you put it was when we had NO money and the city had been burning through big bucks. Stanton was hired and totally reversed the budget where we were finally in the black. Take a look at the 2008/09 expenditures and revenues and you will see what I am talking about--shocking. It took a lot of cuts to do it and it hurt some and angered others. The finance advisory board even brought up the idea of chapter 9. Projects were put off and rightfully so. She even found an account with a million bucks sitting in it that no one knew about. The finance department was changed out and Steve Carr was hired.

    If those property owners with high property values want to vote this in for the greater good, that is the will and fine with me. I am pointing out other things that no one is talking about.

    As far as our "false" economic boom in 2008 when we got a lot of revenue, everyone knows that money went missing. Why can't an internal auditor find it? Stanton fired Scot Menke for fear of knowing a bad audit would come out. Now we have an auditor who has been here for a year with no focus on the utility, the department that has all the money and from what I have been told, where tons of money disappeared.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well, what this proves, is that the City has the money and resources to provide for infrastructure improvements without a major tax increase. To me, that is great news.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Who is in charge of road maintenance for the city? Where is the road paving schedule? I want to see it. How much money should be allocated in each year's budget to pave roads that need to be paved according to this regular schedule? Why hasn't it been allocated? Why was the commission not aware that roads were no being repaved according to a schedule? You can complain all you want about past commissions, past officials. But Maxwell's been on the commission for a number of years now. So maybe he can start answering some of these questions. And then he could start identifying some grant money for road paving. There's lot of federal money out there. Driving ourselves deeper into debt is not the answer to Lake Worth's infrastructure problems.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes Maxwell has been on the commission for a number of years but during most of that time he was up there with children. Now he's working with adults and the changes are coming whether the naysayers like it or not. So remember what you were told in the past- don't go away mad, just go away.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Scott Maxwell was not on the commission when I moved into Lake Worth and addressed the unpaved avenues in the now officially named Genesis Neighborhood. He ran shortly after, I know because I volunteered on his campaign.

    Mark A. Parrilla

    ReplyDelete
  24. I have made some mistakes in assessing candidates, trying to keep an open mind and believing the hype, but we now have a record that we can reflect upon. :)
    At least I didn't vote for the Commander in Chief! (That was put in there to tick off Steve and LD) LOL

    ReplyDelete