Nothing drives me more crazy than the "gutting the code department" myth that is attributed to Susan Stanton who was hired by Lake Worth in April 2009. Following is a speech by our former Code Enforcement Manager, Wayne Bergman, (he was also our acting building official at one time) given in September 2010 at the Tropical Ridge Neighborhood Association on the code enforcement process and outstanding cases. At that meeting, he said that the department was only reduced by one.
..........................
I was asked to speak tonight about the Code Enforcement Process. I supervise the Code Compliance Division of the Community Development Department and our primary purpose is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents and their property through the administration and enforcement of the City’s zoning and property maintenance codes. Code Compliance inspectors investigate complaints and perform COU inspections, re-inspections and inspections ordered by the City’s Special Magistrate. Inspectors and support staff maintain the record files on each case. The inspectors do their best to establish communication with the offending party prior to issuing a Notice of Violation. Once violations have been corrected and complied, an Affidavit of Compliance is issued. If there is no cooperation, a Notice of Violation/Notice of Hearing is issued.
Violations can take several different avenues to achieve
final resolution. Some are resolved
prior to Special Magistrate hearings and the case is closed by City staff. Violations that are not brought into
compliance are presented before the Special Magistrate. Special Magistrate orders are submitted to
the County Courthouse for the recording of code enforcement liens. Upon full compliance and payment, a release
of fines is prepared. This is all in
accordance with FS 162, Municipal Code Enforcement law. Through this process the City has received
767 complaints of violations and 481 violation cases were started during the
last fiscal year. Of these, 561of the
cases have been brought into compliance.
Over the past year the City has adopted changes to
Chapter 2 of the LWCOO which allows the issuance of civil citations as an
alternative enforcement method under FS 162.
The ordinance changes also simplified the process to board-up and secure
unsafe structures and changed the way in which the City releases code liens.
Last week the City Commission approved an ordinance that
requires the registry of foreclosed buildings, which for the first time will
give the City, PBSO and PBC Fire Rescue the lender’s name and contact
information and also provide the City and County agencies with the property
management company that maintains the property.
We are also proposing doing away with the annual COU inspection in favor
of an inspection whenever there is a change in occupancy. The annual inspection process was not
workable and inspections that take place before tenants or owners occupy a
building, or portion thereof, is more meaningful and is a better way to address
the deterioration of the City’s building stock.
This specific ordinance was approved at first reading and could be
adopted later this month.
Some of our New
Initiatives: The Code Compliance
Division will improve its community relations efforts by shifting the
division’s focus from an enforcement-based approach to a more customer-focused
compliance process. New division
policies, training, and an emphasis on providing assistance to tenants and
victims affected by absentee landlords is being implemented, and inspectors are
now targeting more serious blight and safety conditions. Code Compliance will utilize a progressive
hierarchy of code enforcement with property owners, business operators and
tenants by making immediate contact with the resident or tenants and giving
verbal warnings for the infraction, when appropriate, with progressive
follow-up.
Some of our
current and planned Goals are to:
*Provide
assistance and alternatives for families displaced by unsafe buildings.
*Regularly
provide code compliance information
to neighborhood associations.
*Create and
implement a progressive approach
to code enforcement.
*Continue
improvement in the collection and reduction of outstanding code enforcement
fines. As we discussed with the City
Commission this past April, there was the appearance of about $70 million in
uncollected code fines. In truth most of
the fines will never be collected. To
demonstrate this, we researched the top 20 largest code fine cases of the
then-current 750 open cases and presented our finding to the Commission.
SUMMARY:
$13,932,275 – Top 20 Code Cases
$2,156,050 – Supplemental Cases
$6,981 – Administrative Costs
$16,095,306 - Subtotal
$756,700 – Computer Error
$2,611,700 – Remove Improper Fines
$12,726,906 – Remaining Fines, most of that wiped out by lender-initiated foreclosure actions.
$13,932,275 – Top 20 Code Cases
$2,156,050 – Supplemental Cases
$6,981 – Administrative Costs
$16,095,306 - Subtotal
$756,700 – Computer Error
$2,611,700 – Remove Improper Fines
$12,726,906 – Remaining Fines, most of that wiped out by lender-initiated foreclosure actions.
Many of the code cases were simply the result of poor case management by the City in the past and revealed many properties with active, accruing fines, in excess of $1 million, for things such as dead shrubs and tall grass.> Today we have processed about 100 of the 750 total cases and the phantom fine amount has been reduced from the $70 million in April down to $49 million, with another 650 cases left to review and adjust downward the fine amount that may be actually due the City.
Our Code Compliance staff is comprised of 9 employees and
includes an Interim Code Supervisor, 2 secretaries, 5 zone inspectors, and a permit
/ licensing technician. We are hiring two additional inspectors to be paid by
the recently awarded JAG grant. These
two new inspectors will assist the PBSO in targeting properties involved in
criminal activities. We are currently
understaffed in the field, with 1 open Code inspector position and another soon
to be open inspector position, although we are actively interviewing
applicants. Our Division is open Mon –
Fri, 8 am to 4:30 pm, with some inspector time after hours to follow up on
complaints. The Code Compliance Division
has a proposed FY 2011 budget of $912,000, which includes the 2 new JAG
inspectors, board-ups, property cleaning and some limited demolitions of unsafe
abandoned buildings.
Complaints can be sent to us by phone 586-1652, by email
or in written form. You can also provide
the Code Compliance division the complaint through the City’s automated on-line
complaint system accessible through the website.
Sep 2010--Our Code Compliance staff is comprised of 9 employees and includes an Interim Code Supervisor, 2 secretaries, 5 zone inspectors, and a permit / licensing technician. We are hiring two additional inspectors to be paid by the recently awarded JAG grant. These two new inspectors will assist the PBSO in targeting properties involved in criminal activities.
ReplyDeleteNOTHING GUTTED.
3:06pm---NOT TRUE!!!
ReplyDeleteOur Code Compliance Dept. was GUTTED.
You must be getting your info from the same place Obama got his birth certificate from.
I guess when the Code Enforcement division had 17 employees, it was top heavy.
ReplyDeleteIt just was not gutted, anonymous. The information was provided by code enforcement at that time. Now Obama's birth certificate, that's another story. When Bergman gave these stats, the 2010/2011 budget was already formulated and in place and going.
ReplyDeleteThe lack of code officers has never been the problem. It all boils down to the lack of enforcement and the long tedious process from the initial complaint to the finalization. As you can see from Mr. Bergman's statement, ordinances were in effect and being written even then to ensure compliance. Now we have many more in effect but we still have deplorable conditions throughout the city.
ReplyDeleteLynn, thanks for pointing out the TRUTH,AGAIN !
ReplyDeleteI believe you read it wrong, 4:14. It was 9 total with 2 more to be hired.
ReplyDelete