Thursday, November 29, 2012

Tsolkas won't Quit

Comment Up

Our second favorite anarchist was recently arrested:

Resisting an officer, disorderly conduct, trespassing, BRAWLING FIGHTING CORRUPT PUBLIC MORAL DECENCY and released on his own recognizance.

Gads.

15 comments:

  1. One thing about peter is--he doesn't hide behind anonymous when he attacks someone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That doesn't even look like Peter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think he looks very sad. It must be because his girlfriend demonstrated against a patriot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Handsome mug shot. Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for keeping us relevant and in the news. Nice to know that you do have a favorite anarchist.As you know the work we do is important to the earth and the community. No one person is more important than the other. We are committed to making changes from within.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't have a problem with your environmental interests. My problem relates to how you go about "change" that not everyone accepts, wants, agrees with.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "No one person is more important than the other."

    It's called communism.

    Please give one example of where this is working just fine and everyone is happy and equal and everyone is just as important as the next person.... would that be China? Cuba?

    Losers, malcontents, underachievers and trust fund babies.

    Where do I sign?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry Lynn but you cannot separate one from the other. Enviroment and government are one in the same. You have to remember it is not what you or anyone else wants or accepts but what we we want and will accept.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No one cares what you want. Hope they keep arresting you, stilts and all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Being There" said

    "No one person is more important than the other."

    "You have to remember it is not what you or anyone else wants or accepts but what we we want and will accept."

    If "Being There" truly believes that no one person is more important than the other, then what Lynn wants is just as important as what he wants!

    ReplyDelete
  11. You are so right.I believe someone out there gets it. The only difference is we work much harder to acchieve the goals that we want.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh, driving from town to town to scream, shout, protest and lie--great going! Not admirable, sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  13. To Being There" who attempted to post again--
    Yes, I have supported your candidates in the past...some have been better than others...some actually made some good decisions for the city and for the people. Overall, however, I do not like socialists, communists or anyone who breaks the law to call attention to their selfish causes.
    If it came down to an honest socialist or a greedy slumlord or developer type, well, the choice is easy.
    So, calling me disingenuous is crap. If there was something for which I disagreed, I spoke about it--example of that is the beach redevelopment...bad plan...stupid. Another prime example is leasing out our landfill to Sun Recycling at $1,000 a month to dump bad stuff. Your candidate and elected official went against what was smart. Another thing I went against was your elected official's decision to not go forward with the ballot initiative to keep the zoning PROS at the beach thus allowing GB to get its hands on it. I have always stood up for what I believe no matter the person on that seat on the dais. I'm not afraid of voicing my opinion in public.

    ReplyDelete
  14. What bad stuff was dumped?

    ReplyDelete
  15. http://www.lakeworthmedia.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=449

    ReplyDelete