Well, Saddam Hussein said he HAD WEAPONS of mass destruction. Intel said that he had them. Should we wait until they use them and then take action? is that the course we should be taking? 3rd rate country we are becoming but not if you get rid of Obama.
Obama failed to secure a congressional declaration of war, as the constitution and Senator Obama's understanding of it dictated; and that he violated the War Powers Resolution when he invaded Libya. How many billions did Obama spend there, Laurel?
Oh, did Obama send ground forces to Libya? They must have thrown my paper in someone else's yard that day, missed that invasion. For clarification, this blog post was about the economy and run up of debt under Obama. Obviously, Bush's war was the driver behind the need for borrowing. He borrowed to finance his war, then Obama had to borrow to get to a point where we could start withdrawing. That's my point.
Barack Obama has been criticized by the House of Representatives for ignoring the authority of Congress when sending troops to Libya. Barack Obama was criticized by the House of Representatives for using US forces against Libya without congressional approval. The House adopted a resolution, by 268-145, rebuking Obama. It said the president has failed to provide a "compelling rationale" for the nearly three-month old operation to aid rebels.
Look, someone in a prior post said that we *invaded* Libya. We have not *invaded* Libya. We have not sent *ground forces* into Libya. That's all I'm saying. I'm not mixed up. Should we be in Libya at all, under any circumstances? I don't know. I'm not a foreign policy or national security expert. But I know an invasion when I see one. The "rebuke" was wholly partisan. Let's face it, the same block of house members would rebuke him if he didn't pick up the dog poop.
9 comments:
Don't blame you for being upset with Obama, Lynn. Look at all those stupid wars he started! What was he thinking??
Well, Saddam Hussein said he HAD WEAPONS of mass destruction. Intel said that he had them. Should we wait until they use them and then take action? is that the course we should be taking? 3rd rate country we are becoming but not if you get rid of Obama.
Obama failed to secure a congressional declaration of war, as the constitution and Senator Obama's understanding of it dictated; and that he violated the War Powers Resolution when he invaded Libya. How many billions did Obama spend there, Laurel?
Let's all work together to make the election fair. Shall we?
Oh, did Obama send ground forces to Libya? They must have thrown my paper in someone else's yard that day, missed that invasion.
For clarification, this blog post was about the economy and run up of debt under Obama. Obviously, Bush's war was the driver behind the need for borrowing. He borrowed to finance his war, then Obama had to borrow to get to a point where we could start withdrawing. That's my point.
You MISSED IT?????????????????
Barack Obama has been criticized by the House of Representatives for ignoring the authority of Congress when sending troops to Libya.
Barack Obama was criticized by the House of Representatives for using US forces against Libya without congressional approval. The House adopted a resolution, by 268-145, rebuking Obama. It said the president has failed to provide a "compelling rationale" for the nearly three-month old operation to aid rebels.
That came from The Guardian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/03/barack-obama-rebuked-troops-libya
Laurel got her wars mixed up. Easy to do when we are fighting all over the damn globe.
Look, someone in a prior post said that we *invaded* Libya. We have not *invaded* Libya. We have not sent *ground forces* into Libya. That's all I'm saying. I'm not mixed up. Should we be in Libya at all, under any circumstances? I don't know. I'm not a foreign policy or national security expert. But I know an invasion when I see one.
The "rebuke" was wholly partisan. Let's face it, the same block of house members would rebuke him if he didn't pick up the dog poop.
Post a Comment